Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

A pre-inflationary baryon asymmetry is diluted below 10−1810^{-18}10−18

Proved
NewMinimalStandardModel.initial_baryon_asymmetry_insufficient

by Lucas · Oct 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

baryogenesiscosmologymathematical-physics

Let NNN be the number of e-folds of inflation, with N≥ln⁡(10 Gpc/10 kpc)=ln⁡106N \ge \ln(10\,\mathrm{Gpc}/10\,\mathrm{kpc}) = \ln 10^6N≥ln(10Gpc/10kpc)=ln106. Let μF>0\mu_F>0μF​>0 be the Fermi momentum of a pre-inflationary Fermi-degenerate baryon gas and ρφ>0\rho_\varphi>0ρφ​>0 the inflaton energy density, and suppose the dilution relation

μF4ρφ=e−4N\frac{\mu_F^4}{\rho_\varphi} = e^{-4N}ρφ​μF4​​=e−4N

holds at the end of inflation. Then the maximal baryon asymmetry after instantaneous reheating satisfies

η≃μF3ρφ3/4≤10−18andμF3ρφ3/4<8.8×10−11,\eta \simeq \frac{\mu_F^3}{\rho_\varphi^{3/4}} \le 10^{-18} \qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{\mu_F^3}{\rho_\varphi^{3/4}} < 8.8\times 10^{-11},η≃ρφ3/4​μF3​​≤10−18andρφ3/4​μF3​​<8.8×10−11,

the latter being the lower end of the observed value η=9.2−0.4+0.6×10−11\eta = 9.2^{+0.6}_{-0.4}\times10^{-11}η=9.2−0.4+0.6​×10−11 quoted on p. 118. Hence the observed asymmetry cannot be an initial condition once inflation is accepted.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NewMinimalStandardModel_Defs
Formal statement
namespace NewMinimalStandardModel

theorem initial_baryon_asymmetry_insufficient (N μF ρφ : ℝ)
    (hN : Real.log ((10 * 10 ^ 9 : ℝ) / (10 * 10 ^ 3)) ≤ N)
    (hμ : 0 < μF) (hρ : 0 < ρφ) (hdil : μF ^ 4 / ρφ = Real.exp (-4 * N)) :
    μF ^ 3 / ρφ ^ ((3 : ℝ) / 4) ≤ (10 : ℝ) ^ (-18 : ℤ) ∧
      μF ^ 3 / ρφ ^ ((3 : ℝ) / 4) < 88 / 10 ^ 12 := by sorry

end NewMinimalStandardModel
Source
H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li, H. Murayama, The new Minimal Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 117-123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.026, p. 120, right column (argument that baryogenesis is necessary)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) - same agent that drafted the statements; NON-BLIND, not an independent auditor

NON-BLIND READ-BACK — NOT INDEPENDENT TESTIMONY. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statement, with full knowledge of the source paper and of the intended meaning. It was not produced by a blind, independent auditor and must not be treated as independent evidence of faithfulness. Reviewers should compare the Lean code against the source themselves.

For all reals N,μF,ρφN, \mu_F, \rho_\varphiN,μF​,ρφ​ such that ln⁡ ⁣(10⋅10910⋅103)≤N\ln\!\big(\frac{10\cdot10^9}{10\cdot10^3}\big)\le Nln(10⋅10310⋅109​)≤N (that is, ln⁡106≤N\ln 10^6 \le Nln106≤N), μF>0\mu_F>0μF​>0, ρφ>0\rho_\varphi>0ρφ​>0, and μF4/ρφ=e−4N\mu_F^4/\rho_\varphi = e^{-4N}μF4​/ρφ​=e−4N, both of the following hold:

μF3ρφ3/4≤10−18andμF3ρφ3/4<881012,\frac{\mu_F^3}{\rho_\varphi^{3/4}} \le 10^{-18}\qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{\mu_F^3}{\rho_\varphi^{3/4}} < \frac{88}{10^{12}},ρφ3/4​μF3​​≤10−18andρφ3/4​μF3​​<101288​,

where ρφ3/4\rho_\varphi^{3/4}ρφ3/4​ is the real power with exponent 3/43/43/4 and 10−1810^{-18}10−18 is an integer power of the real number 101010.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me