Devetak–Winter step: a corner norm near gives positive key, uniformly in the shields
ProvedHorodeckiBoundKey.near_private_bit_keybound-entanglementcryptographyp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1quantum-information
There is with the following property. For all finite shields , and every state on (one key qubit per party) whose block satisfies
the distillable key of across is strictly positive, .
The paper obtains this from the protocol of Devetak and Winter [8] applied to the measured key of the twisted state and does not prove it. The threshold does not depend on the shields, which matters because the shields of in (12) grow with and .
Formalization Note is quantified before the shield types. is Gap48.P42.distillableKey of finCut, in , so means some positive rate is achievable. Shield types live in Type.
Differences from the source:
- reading: "drawing key … from a state close to singlet, which can be done … by the protocol of Devetak and Winter [8]" → ∃ε₀ > 0 such that for all shields every state with corner trace norm > 1/2 − ε₀ has K > 0; reason: the sentence's content for the states it is applied to: their closeness to a private bit is measured by the corner norm (p.2, approximate security), and their shields grow, so one threshold for all shields is needed
- reading: distillable key K_D (key drawn by local operations and public communication; not defined formally in the paper) → K_γ, the operational private-dit rate Gap48.P42.distillableKey under deterministic finite adaptive LOCC (ℝ≥0∞); reason: p.2 identifies the two rates ("We thus have equality of the two rates", with "Clearly K_γ ≤ K_D") and the proof on p.3 distils γ states "at the same rate as K_D"; the mission uses this one key rate throughout
- encoding: the Alice:Bob cut AA′:BB′ of a state on A B A′ B′ → finCut: partyCut followed by a fixed relabelling of Alice's register Fin 2 × A′ as Fin (2|A′|) and Bob's likewise; reason: the published rates take matrices on Fin a × Fin b; rates, separability and partial transposition are invariant under local relabellings
Preamble
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Dependency50_P24 import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Gap48_P42 import Definitions.Def_HorodeckiBoundKey_finCut open QAlgorithms QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P21 (Op) open scoped Matrix ComplexOrder ENNReal open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Dependency50.P24 (Key keyBlock) open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Gap48.P42 (distillableKey)
Formal statement
namespace HorodeckiBoundKey
/-- Horodecki, Horodecki, Horodecki, Oppenheim, arXiv:quant-ph/0309110v2, p.3: "Clearly, the
problem is reduced to drawing key from outcomes of measurement, from a state close to singlet,
which can be done, for example, by the protocol of Devetak and Winter [8]. As we have already
noted, this will draw γ states at the same rate as K_D when the corresponding classical protocol
is applied coherently."
There is `ε₀ > 0` such that for all finite shields `A′`, `B′` and every state `σ` on `A B A′ B′`
(one key qubit per party) whose `⟨00|·|11⟩` block `X` has `‖X‖₁ > 1/2 − ε₀`, the distillable
key of `σ` across `AA′ : BB′` is strictly positive. The paper uses the Devetak–Winter protocol
[8] for this and does not prove it.
**Formalization Note.** The threshold `ε₀` is chosen **before** the shield types: one
threshold for all shield dimensions, as the shields of `ρ′` in (12) grow with `l` and `n`.
Distillable key is read as `K_γ` (p.2), `Gap48.P42.distillableKey` of `finCut σ` (`ℝ≥0∞`);
`0 < K` means some positive rate is achievable. Shield types are in `Type` (universe 0). -/
theorem near_private_bit_key :
∃ ε₀ : ℝ, 0 < ε₀ ∧
∀ (S T : Type) [Fintype S] [DecidableEq S] [Fintype T] [DecidableEq T]
(σ : Op (Key 2 × (S × T))), IsDensityMatrix σ →
1 / 2 - ε₀ < traceNorm (keyBlock σ (0,0) (1,1)) →
0 < distillableKey (finCut σ) := by sorry
end HorodeckiBoundKey
Source
Horodecki, Horodecki, Horodecki, Oppenheim, Secure key from bound entanglement, arXiv:quant-ph/0309110v2, p.3 ("Clearly, the problem is reduced to drawing key from outcomes of measurement, from a state close to singlet, which can be done, for example, by the protocol of Devetak and Winter [8].")
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.