Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Corollary 3.24 — μ is purely absolutely continuous on I if limsup Im F(λ+iε) < ∞ on I

Proved
TeschlQM.Herglotz.purely_ac_of_limsup_lt_top

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

herglotz-functionsmeasure-theoryp2o-batch-books5p2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-bookp2o-v1spectral-theory

Let μ\muμ be a finite Borel measure on R\mathbb{R}R with Borel transform FFF, and let I⊆RI \subseteq \mathbb{R}I⊆R be a Borel set. If

lim sup⁡ε↓0Im⁡F(λ+iε)<∞for all λ∈I,\limsup_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0} \operatorname{Im} F(\lambda + i\varepsilon) < \infty \qquad \text{for all } \lambda \in I,ε↓0limsup​ImF(λ+iε)<∞for all λ∈I,

then μ\muμ is purely absolutely continuous on III: the restriction μ∣I\mu|_Iμ∣I​ is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure.

Formalization Note. The book does not say what III is (an interval in all its applications); any Borel set is allowed here, which includes intervals. The lim sup⁡\limsuplimsup is taken in ℝ≥0∞ of the nonnegative quantities Im⁡F(λ+iε)\operatorname{Im} F(\lambda + i\varepsilon)ImF(λ+iε), ε>0\varepsilon > 0ε>0.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_TeschlQM_Herglotz_borelTransform

open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped ENNReal Topology
Formal statement
namespace TeschlQM.Herglotz

/-- Teschl, p. 109, Corollary 3.24. Let `μ` be a finite Borel measure and `F` its Borel
transform. If `limsup_{ε↓0} Im(F(λ + iε)) < ∞` for all `λ` in a Borel set `I ⊆ ℝ`, then `μ` is
purely absolutely continuous on `I`: its restriction to `I` is absolutely continuous with
respect to Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem purely_ac_of_limsup_lt_top (μ : Measure ℝ) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (I : Set ℝ)
    (hI : MeasurableSet I)
    (h : ∀ t ∈ I, limsup (fun ε : ℝ => ENNReal.ofReal
        (borelTransform μ ((t : ℂ) + (ε : ℂ) * Complex.I)).im) (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ)) < ⊤) :
    μ.restrict I ≪ volume := by sorry

end TeschlQM.Herglotz
Source
Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, AMS GSM 99, 2009, p. 109, Corollary 3.24
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · claude-opus-5-5

Let μ\muμ be a finite Borel measure on R\mathbb{R}R and F(z)=∫Rdμ(s)s−zF(z)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\frac{d\mu(s)}{s-z}F(z)=∫R​s−zdμ(s)​ its Borel transform (Bochner integral, 000 if not integrable). Let I⊆RI\subseteq\mathbb{R}I⊆R be a Borel-measurable set. Assume that for every t∈It\in It∈I,

lim sup⁡ε↓0 max⁡ ⁣(0,Im⁡F(t+iε))<∞.\limsup_{\varepsilon\downarrow0}\ \max\!\big(0,\operatorname{Im}F(t+i\varepsilon)\big) < \infty .ε↓0limsup​ max(0,ImF(t+iε))<∞.

The limsup is taken in [0,∞][0,\infty][0,∞] over positive ε\varepsilonε, with negative values of Im⁡F\operatorname{Im}FImF replaced by 000 and no factor 1/π1/\pi1/π.

The conclusion is that the restriction of μ\muμ to III is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure λ\lambdaλ:

λ(A)=0  ⟹  μ(A∩I)=0for every set A.\lambda(A)=0 \implies \mu(A\cap I)=0 \quad\text{for every set } A .λ(A)=0⟹μ(A∩I)=0for every set A.

If I=∅I=\varnothingI=∅, the hypothesis is vacuous and so is the conclusion. If μ=0\mu=0μ=0, the hypothesis holds on every III and the conclusion is trivial.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 2, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 2, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me