Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Power contraction for the compact connection wall derivatives

Proved
BianchiIX.exists_compact_connection_weighted_wall_bounds

by trppppp · Nov 5, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

bianchi-ix-era-statisticsdynamical-systems

For real variables p,s,a,b,cp,s,a,b,cp,s,a,b,c, set

K=a2+b2+c2−2(ab+bc+ca),S=p2+s2,C=S+K.K=a^2+b^2+c^2-2(ab+bc+ca),\qquad S=p^2+s^2,\qquad C=S+K.K=a2+b2+c2−2(ab+bc+ca),S=p2+s2,C=S+K.

The shear components and wall rates are

P=Kp−2a2+b2+c2+ab−2bc+ac,P=Kp-2a^2+b^2+c^2+ab-2bc+ac,P=Kp−2a2+b2+c2+ab−2bc+ac, Q=Ks+3(−b2+c2+ab−ac),Q=Ks+\sqrt{3}(-b^2+c^2+ab-ac),Q=Ks+3​(−b2+c2+ab−ac), r1=−S+2p,r2=−S−p+3s,r3=−S−p−3s.r_1=-S+2p,\qquad r_2=-S-p+\sqrt{3}s,\qquad r_3=-S-p-\sqrt{3}s.r1​=−S+2p,r2​=−S−p+3​s,r3​=−S−p−3​s.

These functions define the normalized vacuum Bianchi IX vector field (P,Q,r1a,r2b,r3c)(P,Q,r_1a,r_2b,r_3c)(P,Q,r1​a,r2​b,r3​c). For y=(m,u,v,w)∈R4y=(m,u,v,w)\in\mathbb R^4y=(m,u,v,w)∈R4, define

K(u,v,w)=u2+v2+w2−2(uv+vw+wu),κ=u(v+w−u),K(u,v,w)=u^2+v^2+w^2-2(uv+vw+wu),\qquad \kappa=u(v+w-u),K(u,v,w)=u2+v2+w2−2(uv+vw+wu),κ=u(v+w−u), Fm=−v2+w2+u(v−w)−mκ,Fu=12(1−m2−(v−w)2+u2)u,F_m=-v^2+w^2+u(v-w)-m\kappa,\qquad F_u=\tfrac12(1-m^2-(v-w)^2+u^2)u,Fm​=−v2+w2+u(v−w)−mκ,Fu​=21​(1−m2−(v−w)2+u2)u, Fv=(m−1−κ)v,Fw=(−m−1−κ)w,F=(Fm,Fu,Fv,Fw),F_v=(m-1-\kappa)v,\qquad F_w=(-m-1-\kappa)w,\qquad F=(F_m,F_u,F_v,F_w),Fv​=(m−1−κ)v,Fw​=(−m−1−κ)w,F=(Fm​,Fu​,Fv​,Fw​),

and E(m,v)=(m−1)2+v2E(m,v)=(m-1)^2+v^2E(m,v)=(m−1)2+v2.

For x=(p,s,a,b,c)x=(p,s,a,b,c)x=(p,s,a,b,c), put

ψ(p,z)=3 z1+p,Π(x)=(ψ(p,s),ψ(p,a),ψ(p,b),ψ(p,c)).\psi(p,z)=\frac{\sqrt3\,z}{1+p},\qquad \Pi(x)=(\psi(p,s),\psi(p,a),\psi(p,b),\psi(p,c)).ψ(p,z)=1+p3​z​,Π(x)=(ψ(p,s),ψ(p,a),ψ(p,b),ψ(p,c)).

For y=(m,u,v,w)y=(m,u,v,w)y=(m,u,v,w), set D(y)=3+m2+K(u,v,w)D(y)=3+m^2+K(u,v,w)D(y)=3+m2+K(u,v,w) and

ΞA(y)=(A−1,Am3,Au3,Av3,Aw3),Ξ(y)=Ξ6/D(y)(y).\Xi_A(y)=\left(A-1,\frac{Am}{\sqrt3},\frac{Au}{\sqrt3}, \frac{Av}{\sqrt3},\frac{Aw}{\sqrt3}\right),\qquad \Xi(y)=\Xi_{6/D(y)}(y).ΞA​(y)=(A−1,3​Am​,3​Au​,3​Av​,3​Aw​),Ξ(y)=Ξ6/D(y)​(y).

Write N(x)=(P,Q,r1a,r2b,r3c)N(x)=(P,Q,r_1a,r_2b,r_3c)N(x)=(P,Q,r1​a,r2​b,r3​c) for the normalized vector field and C(x)=C(p,s,a,b,c)\mathcal C(x)=C(p,s,a,b,c)C(x)=C(p,s,a,b,c) for its constraint.

The normalized and projective state spaces are R5\mathbb R^5R5 and R4\mathbb R^4R4 with their finite-product norms. The maps Π,Ξ,D,F\Pi,\Xi,D,FΠ,Ξ,D,F act on these state spaces.

The projective vector field in normalized time is

G(y)=6D(y)F(y).G(y)=\frac6{D(y)}F(y).G(y)=D(y)6​F(y).

Write X=R5X=\mathbb R^5X=R5, Y=R4Y=\mathbb R^4Y=R4, and let αx,t0\alpha_{x,t_0}αx,t0​​ be the maximal solution of α′=N(α)\alpha'=N(\alpha)α′=N(α) with initial value xxx at t0t_0t0​ and domain Imax⁡(x,t0)I_{\max}(x,t_0)Imax​(x,t0​). Put

Jx,t0(t)=dxαx,t0(t),Ψt0(y,t)=Π(αΞ(y),t0(t)),J_{x,t_0}(t)=d_x\alpha_{x,t_0}(t),\qquad \Psi_{t_0}(y,t)=\Pi(\alpha_{\Xi(y),t_0}(t)),Jx,t0​​(t)=dx​αx,t0​​(t),Ψt0​​(y,t)=Π(αΞ(y),t0​​(t)), Jy,t0(t)=dΠαΞ(y),t0(t)∘JΞ(y),t0(t)∘dΞy.\mathcal J_{y,t_0}(t)=d\Pi_{\alpha_{\Xi(y),t_0}(t)} \circ J_{\Xi(y),t_0}(t)\circ d\Xi_y.Jy,t0​​(t)=dΠαΞ(y),t0​​(t)​∘JΞ(y),t0​​(t)∘dΞy​.

For Y=(k,u,w)∈R3Y=(k,u,w)\in\mathbb R^3Y=(k,u,w)∈R3, define

e−(Y)=(1−k2−1,u,1,w),xY=Ξ(e−(Y)),βY(t)=Ψ0(e−(Y),t),g(x)=(Π(x))v.e_-(Y)=(1-\sqrt{k^2-1},u,1,w),\quad x_Y=\Xi(e_-(Y)),\quad \beta_Y(t)=\Psi_0(e_-(Y),t),\quad g(x)=(\Pi(x))_v.e−​(Y)=(1−k2−1​,u,1,w),xY​=Ξ(e−​(Y)),βY​(t)=Ψ0​(e−​(Y),t),g(x)=(Π(x))v​.

For any real height η\etaη, put

Hη,Y={t>0:t∈Imax⁡(xY,0), g(αxY,0(t))=η},H_{\eta,Y}=\{t>0:t\in I_{\max}(x_Y,0),\ g(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t))=\eta\},Hη,Y​={t>0:t∈Imax​(xY​,0), g(αxY​,0​(t))=η}, Tη(Y)=inf⁡Hη,Y,Pη(Y)=βY(Tη(Y)).T_\eta(Y)=\inf H_{\eta,Y},\qquad P_\eta(Y)=\beta_Y(T_\eta(Y)).Tη​(Y)=infHη,Y​,Pη​(Y)=βY​(Tη​(Y)).

The infimum uses the total real-order convention. Let TailValid⁡η(Y)\operatorname{TailValid}_\eta(Y)TailValidη​(Y) mean that Tη(Y)T_\eta(Y)Tη​(Y) is the least element of Hη,YH_{\eta,Y}Hη,Y​, and, writing T=Tη(Y)T=T_\eta(Y)T=Tη​(Y), that

t∈Imax⁡(xY,0),1+(αxY,0(t))0>0(0≤t≤T),t\in I_{\max}(x_Y,0),\quad 1+(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t))_0>0 \quad(0\leq t\leq T),t∈Imax​(xY​,0),1+(αxY​,0​(t))0​>0(0≤t≤T), g(αxY,0(t))>η(0≤t<T),g(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t))>\eta\quad(0\leq t<T),g(αxY​,0​(t))>η(0≤t<T), dgαxY,0(t)N(αxY,0(t))<0,∣(Π(αxY,0(t)))w∣<1/2(0≤t≤T).dg_{\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t)}N(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t))<0,\quad |(\Pi(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t)))_w|<1/2\quad(0\leq t\leq T).dgαxY​,0​(t)​N(αxY​,0​(t))<0,∣(Π(αxY​,0​(t)))w​∣<1/2(0≤t≤T).

All vector and operator norms use the finite-product supremum norms.

For i=0,1i=0,1i=0,1 put j(0)=1j(0)=1j(0)=1, j(1)=3j(1)=3j(1)=3, and define

mi(η,Y)=exp⁡(log⁡(1+(xY)0)−log⁡(1+(αxY,0(Tη(Y)))0)+∫0Tη(Y)rj(i)(αxY,0(t)) dt).m_i(\eta,Y)=\exp\left(\log(1+(x_Y)_0) -\log(1+(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(T_\eta(Y)))_0) +\int_0^{T_\eta(Y)}r_{j(i)}(\alpha_{x_Y,0}(t))\,dt\right).mi​(η,Y)=exp(log(1+(xY​)0​)−log(1+(αxY​,0​(Tη​(Y)))0​)+∫0Tη​(Y)​rj(i)​(αxY​,0​(t))dt).

Let R(m,u,v,w)=(−m,u,w,v)\mathcal R(m,u,v,w)=(-m,u,w,v)R(m,u,v,w)=(−m,u,w,v).

Put c=u(v+w−u)c=u(v+w-u)c=u(v+w−u), s(m,u,v,w)=m−1−cs(m,u,v,w)=m-1-cs(m,u,v,w)=m−1−c, b(m,u,v,w)=(1−m2−(v−w)2+u2)/2b(m,u,v,w)=(1-m^2-(v-w)^2+u^2)/2b(m,u,v,w)=(1−m2−(v−w)2+u2)/2, D(m,u,v,w)=3+m2+K(u,v,w)D(m,u,v,w)=3+m^2+K(u,v,w)D(m,u,v,w)=3+m2+K(u,v,w), and r(m,v)=(m−1)2+v2r(m,v)=\sqrt{(m-1)^2+v^2}r(m,v)=(m−1)2+v2​.

For y∈R4y\in\mathbb R^4y∈R4, put xy=Ξ(y)x_y=\Xi(y)xy​=Ξ(y),

T+(y)=inf⁡{t>0:t∈Imax⁡(xy,0), (Ψ0(y,t))v=1},P+(y)=Ψ0(y,T+(y)).T_+(y)=\inf\{t>0:t\in I_{\max}(x_y,0),\ (\Psi_0(y,t))_v=1\}, \qquad P_+(y)=\Psi_0(y,T_+(y)).T+​(y)=inf{t>0:t∈Imax​(xy​,0), (Ψ0​(y,t))v​=1},P+​(y)=Ψ0​(y,T+​(y)).

Let V+(y)V_+(y)V+​(y) mean that this infimum is a least element, the full interval [0,T+(y)][0,T_+(y)][0,T+​(y)] lies in the maximal domain with 1+(αxy,0(t))0>01+(\alpha_{x_y,0}(t))_0>01+(αxy​,0​(t))0​>0, the active wall is below one before the endpoint, and its normalized-time derivative is strictly positive throughout the interval. The infimum has its total real-order meaning.

Define the reflected radius and the composed entrance, time and state by

Rη(Y)=r((RPη(Y))m,(RPη(Y))v),eη(Y)=RPη(Y),R_\eta(Y)=r((\mathcal R P_\eta(Y))_m,(\mathcal R P_\eta(Y))_v), \qquad e_\eta(Y)=\mathcal R P_\eta(Y),Rη​(Y)=r((RPη​(Y))m​,(RPη​(Y))v​),eη​(Y)=RPη​(Y), Tc(η,Y)=T+(eη(Y))+Tη(Y),Pc(η,Y)=P+(eη(Y)).T_c(\eta,Y)=T_+(e_\eta(Y))+T_\eta(Y),\qquad P_c(\eta,Y)=P_+(e_\eta(Y)).Tc​(η,Y)=T+​(eη​(Y))+Tη​(Y),Pc​(η,Y)=P+​(eη​(Y)).

On the invariant plane with zero active wall, use y=(m,u,w)∈R3y=(m,u,w)\in\mathbb R^3y=(m,u,w)∈R3, the inclusion ι(m,u,w)=(m,u,0,w)\iota(m,u,w)=(m,u,0,w)ι(m,u,w)=(m,u,0,w) and the restriction πs(m,u,v,w)=(m,u,w)\pi_s(m,u,v,w)=(m,u,w)πs​(m,u,v,w)=(m,u,w). Define

f(y)=(mu2−(m+1)uw+w2,1−m2−w2+u22u,−(m+1+uw−u2)w),f(y)=\left(mu^2-(m+1)uw+w^2, \frac{1-m^2-w^2+u^2}{2}u,-(m+1+uw-u^2)w\right),f(y)=(mu2−(m+1)uw+w2,21−m2−w2+u2​u,−(m+1+uw−u2)w), Δ(y)=3+m2+(u−w)2,fo(y)=6f(y)/Δ(y).\Delta(y)=3+m^2+(u-w)^2,\qquad f_o(y)=6f(y)/\Delta(y).Δ(y)=3+m2+(u−w)2,fo​(y)=6f(y)/Δ(y).

Write J=dfJ=dfJ=df, H=d2fH=d^2fH=d2f, Jo=dfoJ_o=df_oJo​=dfo​, Ho=d2foH_o=d^2f_oHo​=d2fo​ for their explicit Jacobian and Hessian expressions. The denominator derivatives are dΔ=(2m,2(u−w),2(w−u))d\Delta=(2m,2(u-w),2(w-u))dΔ=(2m,2(u−w),2(w−u)) and d2Δ(v,z)=2v0z0+2(v1−v2)(z1−z2)d^2\Delta(v,z)=2v_0z_0+2(v_1-v_2)(z_1-z_2)d2Δ(v,z)=2v0​z0​+2(v1​−v2​)(z1​−z2​). The exact original-time boundary flow and its projected variation are

Φ(y,t)=πsΨ0(ιy,t),L(y,t)=πsJιy,0(t)ι.\Phi(y,t)=\pi_s\Psi_0(\iota y,t),\qquad L(y,t)=\pi_s\mathcal J_{\iota y,0}(t)\iota.Φ(y,t)=πs​Ψ0​(ιy,t),L(y,t)=πs​Jιy,0​(t)ι.

For a fixed scale KKK, set ΦK(y,s)=Φ(y,Ks)\Phi_K(y,s)=\Phi(y,Ks)ΦK​(y,s)=Φ(y,Ks), LK(y,s)=L(y,Ks)L_K(y,s)=L(y,Ks)LK​(y,s)=L(y,Ks) and QK(y,s)=dyLK(y,s)Q_K(y,s)=d_yL_K(y,s)QK​(y,s)=dy​LK​(y,s). For directions v,zv,zv,z, define

SK(y,s;v,z)=K[Ho(ΦK)(LKv,LKz)+Jo(ΦK)QK(v,z)].S_K(y,s;v,z)=K\left[H_o(\Phi_K)(L_Kv,L_Kz)+J_o(\Phi_K)Q_K(v,z)\right].SK​(y,s;v,z)=K[Ho​(ΦK​)(LK​v,LK​z)+Jo​(ΦK​)QK​(v,z)].

All vector norms are sup norms, and operator norms are induced by them. Write b(y)=∣u∣+∣w∣b(y)=|u|+|w|b(y)=∣u∣+∣w∣, E(y)=e512b(y)E(y)=e^{512b(y)}E(y)=e512b(y), vs=(v1,v2)v_s=(v_1,v_2)vs​=(v1​,v2​), and

H(y;v,z)=b(y)∥v∥∥z∥+∥vs∥∥z∥+∥v∥∥zs∥,\mathcal H(y;v,z)=b(y)\|v\|\|z\|+\|v_s\|\|z\|+\|v\|\|z_s\|,H(y;v,z)=b(y)∥v∥∥z∥+∥vs​∥∥z∥+∥v∥∥zs​∥, B2(y)=192b(y)(40000E(y)3)+10000E(y)2.B_2(y)=192b(y)(40000E(y)^3)+10000E(y)^2.B2​(y)=192b(y)(40000E(y)3)+10000E(y)2.

The closed boundary region is Sc={(m,u,0,w):∣m−c∣≤1/10, ∣u∣,∣w∣≤1/100}\mathcal S_c=\{(m,u,0,w):|m-c|\leq1/10,\ |u|,|w|\leq1/100\}Sc​={(m,u,0,w):∣m−c∣≤1/10, ∣u∣,∣w∣≤1/100}. The boundary projection P(m,u,w)P(m,u,w)P(m,u,w) is the limit of Φ(m,u,w;t)0\Phi(m,u,w;t)_0Φ(m,u,w;t)0​ as t→∞t\to\inftyt→∞, using the total limit convention of the formal definitions.

Let p(y)=P(y0,y1,y3)p(y)=P(y_0,y_1,y_3)p(y)=P(y0​,y1​,y3​) and ρ(y)=(p(y)−1)2+y22\rho(y)=\sqrt{(p(y)-1)^2+y_2^2}ρ(y)=(p(y)−1)2+y22​​. The finite phase, actual phase and their difference are

Fη(Y)=ρ(eη(Y)),F^η(Y)=r(Pc(η,Y)0,Pc(η,Y)2),Dη=F^η−Fη.F_\eta(Y)=\rho(e_\eta(Y)),\quad \widehat F_\eta(Y)=r(P_c(\eta,Y)_0,P_c(\eta,Y)_2),\quad D_\eta=\widehat F_\eta-F_\eta.Fη​(Y)=ρ(eη​(Y)),Fη​(Y)=r(Pc​(η,Y)0​,Pc​(η,Y)2​),Dη​=Fη​−Fη​.

Put χη(Y)=(Fη(Y),um0(η,Y),wm1(η,Y),η)\chi_\eta(Y)=(F_\eta(Y),u m_0(\eta,Y),w m_1(\eta,Y),\eta)χη​(Y)=(Fη​(Y),um0​(η,Y),wm1​(η,Y),η) for Y=(k,u,w)Y=(k,u,w)Y=(k,u,w), and ℓη(Y)=(log⁡Pc(η,Y)1,log⁡Pc(η,Y)3)\ell_\eta(Y)=(\log P_c(\eta,Y)_1,\log P_c(\eta,Y)_3)ℓη​(Y)=(logPc​(η,Y)1​,logPc​(η,Y)3​). A square-root cone direction means h0=1h_0=1h0​=1, ∣h1∣≤u|h_1|\leq\sqrt u∣h1​∣≤u​ and ∣h2∣≤w|h_2|\leq\sqrt w∣h2​∣≤w​. There exists 0<δ≤1/100000<\delta\leq1/100000<δ≤1/10000 such that, for each 0<η≤δ0<\eta\leq\delta0<η≤δ, there are ε,C>0\varepsilon,C>0ε,C>0 with the following property. For 31/8≤k≤631/8\leq k\leq631/8≤k≤6 and 0<u,w≤ε0<u,w\leq\varepsilon0<u,w≤ε, the tail and entrance return are valid, Pc(η,⋅)P_c(\eta,\cdot)Pc​(η,⋅) is C2C^2C2, and its walls U=Pc(η,Y)1U=P_c(\eta,Y)_1U=Pc​(η,Y)1​, W=Pc(η,Y)3W=P_c(\eta,Y)_3W=Pc​(η,Y)3​ are positive. Every square-root cone direction satisfies

∣(dYPc(η,Y)h)1∣≤C(u+w)19/24U,|(d_YP_c(\eta,Y)h)_1|\leq C(u+w)^{19/24}\sqrt U,∣(dY​Pc​(η,Y)h)1​∣≤C(u+w)19/24U​, ∣(dYPc(η,Y)h)3∣≤C(u+w)2/9W.|(d_YP_c(\eta,Y)h)_3|\leq C(u+w)^{2/9}\sqrt W.∣(dY​Pc​(η,Y)h)3​∣≤C(u+w)2/9W​.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_ProjectiveState
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_CoreAngle
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_ProjectiveFlowVariation
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_ProjectiveReflection
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_CoreTail
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_EntranceReturn
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_Dynamics_CompactConnectionReturn
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_EntrancePhaseResponseData
import Definitions.Def_BianchiIX_TerminalConnectionData
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Prod
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.FunProp
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.ODE.ExistUnique
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Partial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ImplicitContDiff
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Inv
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arcosh
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IntermediateValue
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Tactic.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Arsinh
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Mul
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.ODE.Gronwall
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.ArctanDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.DerivHyp
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.DistLEIntegral
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Matrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Trace
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Determinant
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Deriv
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Cauchy
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.UniformLimitsDeriv
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.InverseFunctionTheorem.ContDiff
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Notation
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Continuity

noncomputable section
open BianchiIX

Formal statement
theorem BianchiIX.exists_compact_connection_weighted_wall_bounds :
    ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), δ ≤ 1 / 10000 ∧ ∀ η : ℝ, (0 < η ∧ η ≤ δ) →
      ∃ ε > (0 : ℝ), ∃ C > (0 : ℝ), ∀ Y : CoreAngleState,
      (31 / 8 ≤ Y 0 ∧ Y 0 ≤ 6) → (0 < Y 1 ∧ Y 1 ≤ ε) → (0 < Y 2 ∧ Y 2 ≤ ε) →
      coreTailValid η Y ∧ entranceReturnValid (compactConnectionEntry η Y) ∧
        ContDiffAt ℝ 2 (compactConnectionState η) Y ∧
        0 < compactConnectionState η Y 1 ∧ 0 < compactConnectionState η Y 3 ∧
        ∀ v : CoreAngleState, v 0 = 1 → |v 1| ≤ Real.sqrt (Y 1) → |v 2| ≤ Real.sqrt (Y 2) →
        |fderiv ℝ (compactConnectionState η) Y v 1| ≤
          C * (Y 1 + Y 2) ^ (19 / 24 : ℝ) * Real.sqrt (compactConnectionState η Y 1) ∧
        |fderiv ℝ (compactConnectionState η) Y v 3| ≤
          C * (Y 1 + Y 2) ^ (2 / 9 : ℝ) * Real.sqrt (compactConnectionState η Y 3) := by sorry
Source
https://github.com/l46430640-del/ERA-STATISTICS-FORMAL/blob/d74c241819f896ab8d050b21ace80c8e90eabd9e/BianchiIX/Dynamics/CompactConnectionWeightedWalls.lean#L9-L95

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me