Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Lemma 9: quantitative quantum-capacity expansion from polynomial degradability

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50.quantumCapacity_polynomialDegradability

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

All systems are nonzero finite-dimensional complex Hilbert spaces. A channel is complex-linear, completely positive and trace preserving. Its receiver and full complementary channel are obtained from the same isometric dilation. Write Q(N)Q(N)Q(N) and P(N)P(N)P(N) for the unassisted operational quantum and private capacities, allowing arbitrary collective codes over independent uses with vanishing reliability error and environmental leakage. Write Ic(N)=max⁡ρ[S(N(ρ))−S(Nc(ρ))]I_c(N)=\max_\rho[S(N(\rho))-S(N^c(\rho))]Ic​(N)=maxρ​[S(N(ρ))−S(Nc(ρ))], where the maximum includes every density operator. Entropies and logarithms are in bits, with 0log⁡0=00\log 0=00log0=0. The diamond norm has no factor 1/21/21/2.

Let N(p):A→BN(p):A\to BN(p):A→B be channels for p∈[0,1]p\in[0,1]p∈[0,1] with fixed finite input/output spaces and a common finite dilation space. Let r>1r>1r>1 and c≥0c\ge0c≥0, and suppose dg⁡(N(p))≤cpr\operatorname{dg}(N(p))\le cp^rdg(N(p))≤cpr throughout this interval. Here dg⁡\operatorname{dg}dg is the minimum, over all CPTP maps D:B→ED:B\to ED:B→E, of ∥Nc−D∘N∥⋄\|N^c-D\circ N\|_\diamond∥Nc−D∘N∥⋄​. If c=0c=0c=0, then Q(N(p))=Ic(N(p))Q(N(p))=I_c(N(p))Q(N(p))=Ic​(N(p)) for every physical ppp. If c>0c>0c>0, there are K≥0K\ge0K≥0 and 0<δ≤10<\delta\le10<δ≤1 such that, for every 0<p<δ0<p<\delta0<p<δ, writing e(p)e(p)e(p) for the actual Choi rank, rank-one values have exact equality and rank e(p)≥2e(p)\ge2e(p)≥2 satisfies

∣Q(N(p))−Ic(N(p))∣≤LQ(e(p),c,r,p)+Kp3r,LQ(e,c,r,p)=crpr−1(−plog⁡2p)+cpr[−log⁡2c+1+1ln⁡2+log⁡2e+12log⁡2(e−1)].|Q(N(p))-I_c(N(p))|\le L_Q(e(p),c,r,p)+Kp^{3r}, \qquad L_Q(e,c,r,p)=crp^{r-1}(-p\log_2p)+cp^r\left[-\log_2c+1+\frac1{\ln2}+\log_2e+\frac12\log_2(e-1)\right].∣Q(N(p))−Ic​(N(p))∣≤LQ​(e(p),c,r,p)+Kp3r,LQ​(e,c,r,p)=crpr−1(−plog2​p)+cpr[−log2​c+1+ln21​+log2​e+21​log2​(e−1)].

The Choi rank may vary with ppp; no constant-rank assumption is required. This gives the quantitative capacity expansion from polynomial approximate degradability.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P50
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators Matrix ComplexConjugate ComplexOrder

open Filter

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50

variable {A B E F : Type}

variable [Fintype A] [DecidableEq A] [Fintype B] [DecidableEq B]

variable [Fintype E] [DecidableEq E] [Fintype F] [DecidableEq F]

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P67
  (IsIsometry receiverChannel complementaryChannel maximumCoherentInformation
    dilationPower idealJoint)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P80 (log2)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P69 (diamond choi)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Support50.P07 (fullTracePrivateCapacity)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier18.P17 (clock)

/-- Lemma 9, PDF p.9: actual Choi rank may vary. The c=0 and rank-one cases are
exact, and the general branch retains the O(p^(3r)) remainder. -/
theorem quantumCapacity_polynomialDegradability [Nonempty A] [Nonempty B] [Nonempty E]
    (V : ℝ → Matrix (B × E) A ℂ)
    (hV : ∀ p ∈ Set.Icc 0 1, IsIsometry (V p))
    (c r : ℝ) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hr : 1 < r)
    (hdg : ∀ p ∈ Set.Icc 0 1, degradability (V p) ≤ c * p ^ r) :
    (c = 0 → ∀ p ∈ Set.Icc 0 1, dilationQuantumCapacity (V p) = maximumCoherentInformation (V p)) ∧
    (0 < c → ∃ K : ℝ, 0 ≤ K ∧ ∃ delta : ℝ, 0 < delta ∧ delta ≤ 1 ∧
      ∀ p ∈ Set.Ioo 0 delta,
        if dilationChoiRank (V p) = 1 then dilationQuantumCapacity (V p) = maximumCoherentInformation (V p)
        else |dilationQuantumCapacity (V p) - maximumCoherentInformation (V p)| ≤
          quantumPolynomialLeading (dilationChoiRank (V p)) c r p + K * p ^ (3 * r)) := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P50

end
Source
Quantum and private capacities of low-noise channels, arXiv:1705.04335v3, PDF p. 9, Lemma 9: quantitative quantum-capacity expansion from polynomial degradability
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

Let A,B,EA,B,EA,B,E be finite nonempty types equipped with decidable equality, and let p↦Vpp\mapsto V_pp↦Vp​ be any family of complex matrices B×E←AB\times E\leftarrow AB×E←A such that Vp†Vp=IAV_p^\dagger V_p=I_AVp†​Vp​=IA​ for every p∈[0,1]p\in[0,1]p∈[0,1]. Write Np(ρ)=Tr⁡E(VpρVp†)N_p(\rho)=\operatorname{Tr}_E(V_p\rho V_p^\dagger)Np​(ρ)=TrE​(Vp​ρVp†​), Npc(ρ)=Tr⁡B(VpρVp†)N_p^c(\rho)=\operatorname{Tr}_B(V_p\rho V_p^\dagger)Npc​(ρ)=TrB​(Vp​ρVp†​), and

d(Vp)=inf⁡{η∈[0,2]:∃D a channel B→E, ∥Npc−D∘Np∥⋄≤η}.d(V_p)=\inf\left\{\eta\in[0,2]: \exists D\text{ a channel }B\to E,\ \|N_p^c-D\circ N_p\|_\diamond\le\eta\right\}.d(Vp​)=inf{η∈[0,2]:∃D a channel B→E, ∥Npc​−D∘Np​∥⋄​≤η}.

Suppose c≥0,r>1c\ge0,r>1c≥0,r>1 are real and d(Vp)≤cprd(V_p)\le cp^rd(Vp​)≤cpr for every p∈[0,1]p\in[0,1]p∈[0,1]. Then both of the following implications hold: if c=0c=0c=0, then Q(Np)=Imax⁡(Vp)Q(N_p)=I_{\max}(V_p)Q(Np​)=Imax​(Vp​) for every p∈[0,1]p\in[0,1]p∈[0,1]; if c>0c>0c>0, there exist real constants K≥0K\ge0K≥0 and 0<δ≤10<\delta\le10<δ≤1 such that for every 0<p<δ0<p<\delta0<p<δ, writing

ep=rank⁡JNp,(JNp)(a,b),(a′,b′)=Np(Ea,a′)b,b′,e_p=\operatorname{rank}J_{N_p}, \qquad (J_{N_p})_{(a,b),(a',b')}=N_p(E_{a,a'})_{b,b'},ep​=rankJNp​​,(JNp​​)(a,b),(a′,b′)​=Np​(Ea,a′​)b,b′​,

one has Q(Np)=Imax⁡(Vp)Q(N_p)=I_{\max}(V_p)Q(Np​)=Imax​(Vp​) when ep=1e_p=1ep​=1, and otherwise

∣Q(Np)−Imax⁡(Vp)∣≤crpr−1(−plog⁡2p)+cpr[−log⁡2c+1+1ln⁡2+log⁡2ep+12log⁡2(ep−1)]+Kp3r.|Q(N_p)-I_{\max}(V_p)| \le crp^{r-1}(-p\log_2p) +cp^r\left[-\log_2c+1+\frac1{\ln2} +\log_2e_p+\frac12\log_2(e_p-1)\right]+Kp^{3r}.∣Q(Np​)−Imax​(Vp​)∣≤crpr−1(−plog2​p)+cpr[−log2​c+1+ln21​+log2​ep​+21​log2​(ep​−1)]+Kp3r.

Here Ea,a′E_{a,a'}Ea,a′​ is the matrix unit, a density matrix is positive semidefinite with trace one, and

Imax⁡(Vp)=sup⁡ρ density[H(Np(ρ))−H(Npc(ρ))],H(ρ)=−Re⁡Tr⁡[(x↦xlog⁡2x)(ρ)].I_{\max}(V_p)=\sup_{\rho\text{ density}} [H(N_p(\rho))-H(N_p^c(\rho))], \qquad H(\rho)=-\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}[(x\mapsto x\log_2x)(\rho)].Imax​(Vp​)=ρ densitysup​[H(Np​(ρ))−H(Npc​(ρ))],H(ρ)=−ReTr[(x↦xlog2​x)(ρ)].

A channel is a map X↦∑jKjXKj†X\mapsto\sum_jK_jXK_j^\daggerX↦∑j​Kj​XKj†​ for a finite family with ∑jKj†Kj=I\sum_jK_j^\dagger K_j=I∑j​Kj†​Kj​=I. The number Q(N)Q(N)Q(N) is the real supremum of nonnegative sss for which there are, for every natural nnn, positive integers MnM_nMn​ and encoding and decoding channels between MnM_nMn​ dimensions and the input and output spaces of N⊗nN^{\otimes n}N⊗n, whose entanglement fidelity tends to one and for which, for every ξ>0\xi>0ξ>0, eventually s−ξ≤log⁡2Mn/ns-\xi\le\log_2M_n/ns−ξ≤log2​Mn​/n. That fidelity is the overlap of ∣ϕMn⟩⟨ϕMn∣|\phi_{M_n}\rangle\langle\phi_{M_n}|∣ϕMn​​⟩⟨ϕMn​​∣ with its image under the identity on the first factor and the encoded, transmitted, decoded channel on the second, where ϕM=M−1/2∑j∣j,j⟩\phi_M=M^{-1/2}\sum_j|j,j\rangleϕM​=M−1/2∑j​∣j,j⟩; tensor powers send tensor products of matrix units to tensor products of their images. The diamond quantity is sup⁡∥X∥1≤1∥(idA⊗Φ)(X)∥1\sup_{\|X\|_1\le1}\|(\mathrm{id}_A\otimes\Phi)(X)\|_1sup∥X∥1​≤1​∥(idA​⊗Φ)(X)∥1​, over all complex matrices on A×AA\times AA×A, with amplification acting on reference matrix blocks and ∥X∥1=Re⁡Tr⁡X†X\|X\|_1=\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{Tr}\sqrt{X^\dagger X}∥X∥1​=ReTrX†X​. All real powers use real exponentiation, and log⁡2x=ln⁡x/ln⁡2\log_2x=\ln x/\ln2log2​x=lnx/ln2. No continuity of VpV_pVp​ is assumed; the positive-ccc conclusion excludes p=0,δp=0,\deltap=0,δ, while the zero-ccc conclusion includes p=0,1p=0,1p=0,1.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me