Graph angle of the framed linearized flow equals twice the polar angle of the contact path
ProvedHryniewiczCriterion.homogeneous_graph_angle_transportcontact-geometryhamiltonian-dynamicssymplectic-geometry
Let be a homogeneous convex model, a periodic orbit of on , its normalized variational flow, the symplectic frame at with columns , , , , and the contact-plane path. Then there are continuous angle functions on and on , both vanishing at , such that
with symmetric positive definite and the rotation by , and
Here is the graph unitary. This is the frame-change step of HWZ (3.38)–(3.41), where the linearized flow along the orbit is compared, through the contractible loop of frames , with the split flow .
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_HryniewiczCriterion_GraphAngle open HryniewiczCriterion open scoped ContDiff
Formal statement
theorem HryniewiczCriterion.homogeneous_graph_angle_transport (K : R4 → ℝ) (hK : IsHomogeneousConvexModel K)
(Q : PeriodicOrbit K) (Z : ℝ → (R4 →L[ℝ] R4)) (hZ : IsLinearizedFlow K Q.x Z) :
∃ θ α : ℝ → ℝ, IsDetAngleLift (fun t => graphUnitary4 (frameFlowMatrix K Q Z t)) Q.T θ ∧
IsPolarAngleLift (linearizedXiPath K Q Z) α ∧ θ Q.T = 2 * α 1 := by sorrySource
Hofer–Wysocki–Zehnder, The dynamics on three-dimensional strictly convex energy surfaces, Ann. of Math. 148 (1998), https://doi.org/10.2307/120994, proof of Theorem 3.4, (3.36)–(3.41), p. 221 (contractible frame loop), with the frame of Hryniewicz, https://arxiv.org/html/1105.2077v5, Section 2.1.1, equations (4)–(5). Reduction lemma; not a verbatim numbered assertion.