Equation (5.2) and Lemma 5.2: same-marginal entropy correction
Provedmme_stothers_lemma52_same_marginalLet be the marginal map of Equation (5.2). First, its kernel is exactly the span of
Second, let . Assume , , every coordinate of is strictly positive, and lies in that two-dimensional kernel. Then
The stationary set is the subset of satisfying and . These are the equations derived in Stothers's thesis and from the displayed kernel; they correct the inconsistent equations printed in the journal.
import Definitions.Def_mme_stothers_fourth_data open MME BigOperators set_option autoImplicit false
theorem mme_stothers_lemma52_same_marginal :
(∀ x : Fin 10 → Real,
(∀ j : Fin 9, MME.StothersFourth.Q x j = 0) ↔
MME.StothersFourth.InY x) ∧
(∀ a b : Fin 10 → Real,
MME.StothersFourth.InZ a →
MME.StothersFourth.InN b →
(∀ i : Fin 10, 0 < b i) →
MME.StothersFourth.InY (fun i => a i - b i) →
MME.StothersFourth.entropyProduct b ≤
MME.StothersFourth.entropyProduct a) := by
sorryRead-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-5
Blind read-back of Milestone3.lean
mme_stothers_lemma52_same_marginal
The theorem is the conjunction of two assertions over real -coordinate vectors and has no field, tensor, or parameter. First, for every , the following nine equations hold simultaneously, , , , , , , , , and , if and only if there exist real numbers such that ; both directions of the equivalence are asserted, while uniqueness of is not part of the stated right-hand side. Second, for every pair and of real vectors, if (i) every and ; (ii) every , , , and ; (iii) in addition, every coordinate of is strictly positive; and (iv) there exist real such that , then , where, writing , . The conclusion is non-strict; is required only to be nonnegative, not strictly positive and not to satisfy the two polynomial equations, so zero coordinates of are included and contribute under the total real-power operation; strict positivity is imposed only on , in addition to all of the nonnegativity, normalization, and polynomial conditions already contained in its second premise. Because the premises form an implication chain, the second assertion imposes no comparison when any one of them fails.
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).