Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (4.11): Re[−∫−∞0idηη2∏j(1−ikjη)eiktη]=−kt+∑i>jkikjkt+k1k2k3kt2\mathrm{Re}\big[-\int_{-\infty}^0 i\frac{d\eta}{\eta^2}\prod_j(1-ik_j\eta)e^{ik_t\eta}\big] = -k_t+\frac{\sum_{i>j}k_ik_j}{k_t}+\frac{k_1k_2k_3}{k_t^2}Re[−∫−∞0​iη2dη​∏j​(1−ikj​η)eikt​η]=−kt​+kt​∑i>j​ki​kj​​+kt2​k1​k2​k3​​

Proved
Maldacena2003.graviton_vertex_integral_I

by Lucas · Oct 12, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cosmologyinflationmathematical-physics

Let k1,k2,k3>0k_1,k_2,k_3>0k1​,k2​,k3​>0 and kt=k1+k2+k3k_t = k_1+k_2+k_3kt​=k1​+k2​+k3​. For a cutoff η0<0\eta_0<0η0​<0 and ϵ>0\epsilon>0ϵ>0, consider

Jϵ(η0)=Re[− i∫−∞η0(1−ik1η)(1−ik2η)(1−ik3η)η2 eiktη eϵη dη].J_\epsilon(\eta_0) = \mathrm{Re}\Big[-\,i\int_{-\infty}^{\eta_0}\frac{(1-ik_1\eta)(1-ik_2\eta)(1-ik_3\eta)}{\eta^2}\,e^{ik_t\eta}\,e^{\epsilon\eta}\,d\eta\Big].Jϵ​(η0​)=Re[−i∫−∞η0​​η2(1−ik1​η)(1−ik2​η)(1−ik3​η)​eikt​ηeϵηdη].

Then there is a function JJJ such that Jϵ(η0)→J(η0)J_\epsilon(\eta_0)\to J(\eta_0)Jϵ​(η0​)→J(η0​) as ϵ→0+\epsilon\to0^+ϵ→0+ for every η0<0\eta_0<0η0​<0, and

lim⁡η0→0−J(η0)=−kt+k1k2+k1k3+k2k3kt+k1k2k3kt2=I.\lim_{\eta_0\to0^-}J(\eta_0) = -k_t + \frac{k_1k_2+k_1k_3+k_2k_3}{k_t} + \frac{k_1k_2k_3}{k_t^2} = I .η0​→0−lim​J(η0​)=−kt​+kt​k1​k2​+k1​k3​+k2​k3​​+kt2​k1​k2​k3​​=I.

This is the integral III of eq. (4.11). It controls the graviton–scalar–scalar correlator (4.10) and the three-graviton correlator (4.15). The integral diverges at η→0\eta\to0η→0, but the divergence is purely imaginary, so the real part has a finite limit.

Formalization Note The iϵi\epsiloniϵ prescription is the damping factor eϵηe^{\epsilon\eta}eϵη with ϵ→0+\epsilon\to0^+ϵ→0+. The upper endpoint 000 is reached as the limit η0→0−\eta_0\to0^-η0​→0− of the real part.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_Maldacena2003_InflationDefs
open Filter Topology
Formal statement
namespace Maldacena2003

theorem graviton_vertex_integral_I (k₁ k₂ k₃ : ℝ) (h₁ : 0 < k₁) (h₂ : 0 < k₂) (h₃ : 0 < k₃) :
    ∃ J : ℝ → ℝ,
      (∀ η₀ : ℝ, η₀ < 0 →
        Tendsto
          (fun ε : ℝ => (-(Complex.I * ∫ η in Set.Iic η₀,
            (1 - Complex.I * (k₁ : ℂ) * (η : ℂ)) * (1 - Complex.I * (k₂ : ℂ) * (η : ℂ))
              * (1 - Complex.I * (k₃ : ℂ) * (η : ℂ))
              * Complex.exp (Complex.I * ((k₁ + k₂ + k₃ : ℝ) : ℂ) * (η : ℂ)) / (η : ℂ) ^ 2
              * (Real.exp (ε * η) : ℂ))).re)
          (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 (J η₀))) ∧
      Tendsto J (𝓝[<] 0)
        (𝓝 (-(k₁ + k₂ + k₃) + (k₂ * k₁ + k₃ * k₁ + k₃ * k₂) / (k₁ + k₂ + k₃)
          + k₁ * k₂ * k₃ / (k₁ + k₂ + k₃) ^ 2)) := by sorry

end Maldacena2003
Source
J. Maldacena, Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, JHEP 05 (2003) 013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013 (arXiv:astro-ph/0210603), p. 18, eq. (4.11) and footnote 17
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 13, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 13, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me