Flat universe dominated by one fluid:
ProvedCosmologyEOS.flat_universe_power_lawLet be Newton's constant and let . Let be real functions of time such that for every : and are differentiable at , , , the fluid equation holds, and the flat Friedmann equation holds. Suppose the universe starts from a big bang at , i.e. as . Then there is a constant such that
This is the source's statement that, if the fluid is the dominant form of matter in a flat universe, , where is the proper time.
Formalization Note The proportionality is normalized by placing the big bang at . Neither monotonicity of nor positivity of is assumed; the hypothesis is where the source's exponent is defined (the case is treated separately).
import Mathlib import Definitions.Def_CosmologyEOS_Defs open Real Filter Topology
namespace CosmologyEOS
theorem flat_universe_power_law (G w : ℝ) (hG : 0 < G) (hw : -1 < w) (a ε p : ℝ → ℝ)
(ha_diff : ∀ t > 0, DifferentiableAt ℝ a t)
(hε_diff : ∀ t > 0, DifferentiableAt ℝ ε t)
(ha_pos : ∀ t > 0, 0 < a t)
(heos : ∀ t > 0, p t = w * ε t)
(hfluid : ∀ t > 0, FluidEquation a ε p t)
(hfried : ∀ t > 0, FlatFriedmannEquation G a ε t)
(hbang : Tendsto a (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0)) :
∃ C > 0, ∀ t > 0, a t = C * t ^ (2 / (3 * (1 + w))) := by
sorry
end CosmologyEOSRead-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) — same agent as the drafter; NON-BLIND
NON-BLIND READ-BACK — NOT INDEPENDENT TESTIMONY. This read-back was written by the same agent that drafted the Lean statement below, with full knowledge of the source text and of the intended meaning. It was not produced by a blind, independent auditor, so it must not be mistaken for independent testimony; reviewers should compare the Lean code with the source themselves.
Let with and , and let . Assume that for every real : is differentiable at ; is differentiable at ; ; ; ; and . Assume further that as from the right (only values at matter; is unconstrained). Then there exists a real such that for every ,
with the real power. Nothing is assumed about the functions for , about the sign of , or about the monotonicity of .