Dusart, Lemme 55:
OpenExplicitPNT.dusart_G2_lt_expLet and let be a root of , where , , are as in Dusart's (2.18), (2.32), (2.38) (see ExplicitPNT.dusart_k_root_exists). With put
where
Then
This is Lemme 55 of Dusart's habilitation, display (2.43). Proof in the source: by Lemme 52, and , so , whence . Since , coincides with (2.33), so and, using (2.41), . Multiply.
Formalization note. The source states the lemma for , with , but its proof uses the bounds of Lemme 52, proved under and ; those are the hypotheses here, and they are exactly the range produced by Lemme 51. is two nested Real.sqrt.
Preamble
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
Formal statement
theorem ExplicitPNT.dusart_G2_lt_exp (X ν : ℝ) (hX : (836 / 100 : ℝ) < X)
(hν₀ : (97 / 100 : ℝ) < ν) (hν₁ : ν < 1)
(hk : X / (2 * Real.pi) *
Real.sqrt ((ν ^ 2 * (ν - Real.log (2 * Real.pi) / X)) ^ 3 /
(ν ^ 2 / (2 * ν ^ 2 - 1) *
(ν + (1 - 2 * Real.log (2 * Real.pi)) / (2 * X)))) *
Real.exp (-(2 * X * (1 - ν))) * Real.exp (-(X * (1 - ν) ^ 2 / ν)) = 1) :
let δ := Real.sqrt (2 / Real.pi) *
Real.sqrt (Real.sqrt
(ν ^ 6 / (2 * ν ^ 2 - 1) *
(1 - (Real.log (2 * Real.pi) - 1 / 2) / (X * ν)) *
(1 - Real.log (2 * Real.pi) / (X * ν)))) *
Real.exp (-(X * (1 - ν) ^ 2 / ν) / 2) * Real.sqrt X * Real.exp (-X)
let T₂ := Real.exp (ν * X)
let q := ((137 / 1000 : ℝ) * Real.log T₂ + 443 / 1000) /
(T₂ * Real.log T₂ * Real.log (T₂ / (2 * Real.pi)))
let G₂ := ((1 + δ) ^ 3 + 1) ^ 2 / 2 ^ 2 * (1 + 2 * Real.pi * q)
G₂ < Real.exp ((264 / 100 : ℝ) * Real.sqrt X * Real.exp (-X)) := by
sorrySource
P. Dusart, Estimations explicites en Théorie Analytique des Nombres (HDR, 2022), Lemme 55, display (2.43), printed p. 45 (PDF p. 55); definitions (2.7), (2.16), (2.17), (2.19), (2.26), (2.33), (2.34) on printed pp. 38-42; https://www.unilim.fr/pages_perso/pierre.dusart/Documents/HDR_Dusart.pdf