Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Corollary 3.2 — completion times of the (αj)(\alpha_j)(αj​)-schedule via α\alphaα-points

Proved
SingleMachineSched.AlphaSched.corollary_3_2

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

alpha-pointslist-schedulingp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1scheduling

Let nnn jobs have integral processing times pj>0p_j > 0pj​>0, integral release dates rj≥0r_j \ge 0rj​≥0 and weights wj>0w_j > 0wj​>0, indexed by nonincreasing wj/pjw_j/p_jwj​/pj​. Let α=(αk)\boldsymbol\alpha = (\alpha_k)α=(αk​) with 0<αk≤10 < \alpha_k \le 10<αk​≤1 for all kkk, and let CjαC^{\boldsymbol\alpha}_jCjα​ be the completion time of job jjj in the (αj)(\alpha_j)(αj​)-schedule. With tj(αj)t_j(\alpha_j)tj​(αj​) the αj\alpha_jαj​-point of jjj and ηk(αj)\eta_k(\alpha_j)ηk​(αj​) the fraction of job kkk processed by time tj(αj)t_j(\alpha_j)tj​(αj​), both in the LP schedule,

Cjα≤tj(αj)+∑k : αk≤ηk(αj)(1+αk−ηk(αj)) pk.C^{\boldsymbol\alpha}_j \le t_j(\alpha_j) + \sum_{k \,:\, \alpha_k \le \eta_k(\alpha_j)} \big(1 + \alpha_k - \eta_k(\alpha_j)\big)\, p_k .Cjα​≤tj​(αj​)+k:αk​≤ηk​(αj​)∑​(1+αk​−ηk​(αj​))pk​.

The sum ranges over all jobs kkk, including k=jk = jk=j, for which ηj(αj)=αj\eta_j(\alpha_j) = \alpha_jηj​(αj​)=αj​ and the term is pjp_jpj​. This is the basic bound from which the paper's analyses of the α\alphaα-schedule and the (αj)(\alpha_j)(αj​)-schedule start.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SingleMachineSched_AlphaSched_AlphaSchedule
Formal statement
namespace SingleMachineSched.AlphaSched

open Classical in
/-- Corollary 3.2 (Goemans et al. 2002, p. 179): for every `α ∈ (0, 1]ⁿ`, the completion time of
job `j` in the `(α_j)`-schedule satisfies
`C^α_j ≤ t_j(α_j) + Σ_{k : α_k ≤ η_k(α_j)} (1 + α_k - η_k(α_j)) p_k`,
where `α`-points and `η` are taken in the LP schedule. The sum includes `k = j`. -/
theorem corollary_3_2 {n : ℕ} (p r : Fin n → ℕ) (w : Fin n → ℝ)
    (hp : ∀ j, 0 < p j) (hw : ∀ j, 0 < w j)
    (hsort : ∀ j k : Fin n, j ≤ k → w k / p k ≤ w j / p j)
    (α : Fin n → ℝ) (hα : ∀ k, 0 < α k ∧ α k ≤ 1) (j : Fin n) :
    alphaCompletion p r α j ≤
      alphaPoint p (lpSet p r) j (α j) +
        ∑ k ∈ Finset.univ.filter (fun k => α k ≤ eta p (lpSet p r) j (α j) k),
          (1 + α k - eta p (lpSet p r) j (α j) k) * (p k : ℝ) := by sorry

end SingleMachineSched.AlphaSched
Source
Goemans, Queyranne, Schulz, Skutella & Wang, Single Machine Scheduling with Release Dates, SIAM J. Discrete Math. 15(2) (2002), p. 179, Corollary 3.2
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me