Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (45): descent inequality for h+qh + qh+q under (44)

Proved
NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad.eq45_descent_lemma

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

nonconvex-optimizationp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let h,q:Rn→Rh, q : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}h,q:Rn→R be twice continuously differentiable and ℓ>0\ell > 0ℓ>0, and suppose condition (44) holds: −ℓI⪯∇2h(x)+∇2q(x)⪯ℓI-\ell I \preceq \nabla^2 h(x) + \nabla^2 q(x) \preceq \ell I−ℓI⪯∇2h(x)+∇2q(x)⪯ℓI for all xxx. Then for all u,v∈Rnu, v \in \mathbb{R}^nu,v∈Rn,

(h+q)(v)≤(h+q)(u)+⟨∇h(u)+∇q(u), v−u⟩+ℓ2∥v−u∥2.(h + q)(v) \le (h + q)(u) + \langle \nabla h(u) + \nabla q(u),\, v - u\rangle + \frac{\ell}{2}\|v - u\|^2 .(h+q)(v)≤(h+q)(u)+⟨∇h(u)+∇q(u),v−u⟩+2ℓ​∥v−u∥2.

In the paper this is applied at (u,v)=(xt,xt+1)(u, v) = (x^t, x^{t+1})(u,v)=(xt,xt+1); it is the first step of the sufficient-decrease estimate (46).

Formalization Note Stated for all pairs (u,v)(u, v)(u,v), the form the paper's justification ("∇(h+q)\nabla(h+q)∇(h+q) is Lipschitz continuous with modulus at most ℓ\ellℓ") yields; convexity of qqq is not needed here.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_NonconvexSplitting_ProxGrad_HessianSandwich

open scoped InnerProductSpace
Formal statement
namespace NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad

/-- Eq. (45) of Li–Pong (p. 18), in its two-point form: under (44), `∇(h + q)` is
`ℓ`-Lipschitz, so `(h+q)(v) ≤ (h+q)(u) + ⟪∇h(u) + ∇q(u), v - u⟫ + (ℓ/2)‖v - u‖²`. -/
theorem eq45_descent_lemma {n : ℕ} (h q : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → ℝ) (ℓ : ℝ)
    (hh : ContDiff ℝ 2 h) (hq : ContDiff ℝ 2 q) (hℓ : 0 < ℓ) (h44 : HessianSandwich h q ℓ)
    (u v : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) :
    h v + q v ≤ h u + q u + ⟪gradient h u + gradient q u, v - u⟫_ℝ + ℓ / 2 * ‖v - u‖ ^ 2 := by sorry

end NonconvexSplitting.ProxGrad
Source
Li & Pong, Global Convergence of Splitting Methods for Nonconvex Composite Optimization, arXiv:1407.0753v6, p. 18, Eq. (45)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me