Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaGalaxyBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
Log in
← Formalpedia

Theorem 4 (Wall 2013): the GSL implies a quantum singularity theorem

Open
WallGSL.quantum_singularity_theorem

by Lucas · Oct 4, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

general-relativitygeneralized-second-lawsingularity-theorem

Theorem 4 (quantum singularity theorem). Let (M,g)(M,g)(M,g) be a time-oriented Lorentzian spacetime, C∞C^\inftyC∞, Hausdorff and second countable, and let SgenS_{\rm gen}Sgen​ be a generalized entropy assigning a real number to every region of MMM. Assume:

  1. MMM is globally hyperbolic: no closed timelike curves, and J+(p)∩J−(q)J^+(p)\cap J^-(q)J+(p)∩J−(q) is compact for all p,qp,qp,q;
  2. TTT is a quantum trapped surface: TTT is the nonempty compact boundary, inside a connected Cauchy surface Σ\SigmaΣ, of a relatively open exterior region Ext⊆Σ\mathrm{Ext}\subseteq\SigmaExt⊆Σ with noncompact closure, and the generalized entropy outside the null surface NNN shot outwards and to the future from TTT is decreasing at every point of TTT;
  3. the semiclassical approximation holds near TTT, in the form of the comparison principle of Theorem 1 at every point g0∈Tg_0\in Tg0​∈T, comparing NNN against causal horizons;
  4. the fine-grained GSL holds: for every observer WWW and Cauchy surfaces Σ′\Sigma'Σ′ nowhere to the past of Σ\SigmaΣ,
Sgen(Σ′∩I−(W)) ≥ Sgen(Σ∩I−(W)).S_{\rm gen}(\Sigma'\cap I^-(W))\ \ge\ S_{\rm gen}(\Sigma\cap I^-(W)).Sgen​(Σ′∩I−(W)) ≥ Sgen​(Σ∩I−(W)).

Then

M is not null geodesically complete,M \text{ is not null geodesically complete,}M is not null geodesically complete,

i.e. there is a singularity somewhere.

This is the quantum analogue of Penrose's singularity theorem, with the null energy condition replaced by the generalized second law. It is the main result of the paper and the goal of this mission.

Formalization Note The generalized entropy is an arbitrary function Sgen : Set M → ℝ; all physical input is in hypotheses 2–4 (see the definition files). Hausdorffness and second countability are the field's standing conventions for spacetimes.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_WallGSL_GeneralizedEntropy

open scoped Manifold Topology ContDiff
open Set
Formal statement
namespace WallGSL

/-- Theorem 4 of Wall (2013): a globally hyperbolic spacetime containing a quantum
trapped surface `T`, near which the semiclassical approximation holds, and in which the
fine-grained GSL holds, is not null geodesically complete. -/
theorem quantum_singularity_theorem
    {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
    {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [T2Space M] [SecondCountableTopology M]
    [ChartedSpace E M] [IsManifold 𝓘(ℝ, E) ∞ M]
    (st : LorentzianMetric E M) (Sgen : Set M → ℝ) (S T Ext : Set M)
    (hGH : st.IsGloballyHyperbolic)
    (hT : st.IsQuantumTrappedSurface Sgen S T Ext)
    (hSC : ∀ g₀ ∈ T, st.TheoremOneComparisonAt Sgen
      (st.outgoingNullSurface S T Ext) (st.outgoingExterior S Ext) g₀)
    (hGSL : st.FineGrainedGSL Sgen) :
    ¬ st.IsNullGeodesicallyComplete := by sorry

end WallGSL
Source
A. C. Wall, The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem, Class. Quantum Grav. 30 (2013) 165003, https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/16/165003, §3.2, Theorem 4, p. 15
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · Aristotle (Harmonic) - same agent as the drafter; non-blind

Provenance note — this read-back is NOT blind. It was written by the same agent (Aristotle, by Harmonic) that drafted the Lean statements, with full knowledge of the source paper and of the intended meaning. It is therefore not independent testimony and must not be mistaken for a blind audit; reviewers should treat it as the drafter's own literal reading of the code and compare it against the source themselves.

Data. A finite-dimensional real inner product space EEE; a topological space MMM that is Hausdorff and second countable, with charts into EEE forming a C∞C^\inftyC∞ manifold structure; a time-oriented Lorentzian metric (g,τ)(g,\tau)(g,τ) on MMM in the sense of WallGSL_Spacetime; an arbitrary function SgenS_{\rm gen}Sgen​ from subsets of MMM to R\mathbb RR; and three subsets S,T,Ext⊆MS,T,\mathrm{Ext}\subseteq MS,T,Ext⊆M.

Hypotheses.

  1. MMM is globally hyperbolic: there is no ppp with p≪pp\ll pp≪p, and J+({p})∩J−({q})J^+(\{p\})\cap J^-(\{q\})J+({p})∩J−({q}) is compact for all p,qp,qp,q.
  2. (Sgen,S,T,Ext)(S_{\rm gen},S,T,\mathrm{Ext})(Sgen​,S,T,Ext) is a quantum trapped surface: SSS is a Cauchy surface (met exactly once by every inextendible timelike curve) and is connected; Ext⊆S\mathrm{Ext}\subseteq SExt⊆S and Ext=V∩S\mathrm{Ext}=V\cap SExt=V∩S for an open VVV; Ext‾\overline{\mathrm{Ext}}Ext is not compact; T=(Ext‾∩S)∖ExtT=(\overline{\mathrm{Ext}}\cap S)\setminus\mathrm{Ext}T=(Ext∩S)∖Ext, nonempty and compact; and for each g0∈Tg_0\in Tg0​∈T there is a Cauchy surface Σ∋g0\Sigma\ni g_0Σ∋g0​ such that every neighbourhood UUU of g0g_0g0​ admits a Cauchy surface Σ′\Sigma'Σ′ with Σ′∖U=Σ∖U\Sigma'\setminus U=\Sigma\setminus UΣ′∖U=Σ∖U, Σ′⊆J+(Σ)\Sigma'\subseteq J^+(\Sigma)Σ′⊆J+(Σ) and Sgen(Σ′∩X)<Sgen(Σ∩X)S_{\rm gen}(\Sigma'\cap X)<S_{\rm gen}(\Sigma\cap X)Sgen​(Σ′∩X)<Sgen​(Σ∩X), where X=(I+(S∖Ext)‾)cX=\big(\overline{I^+(S\setminus\mathrm{Ext})}\big)^cX=(I+(S∖Ext)​)c.
  3. For every g0∈Tg_0\in Tg0​∈T, the Theorem-1 comparison holds at g0g_0g0​ for the pair (N,X)(N,X)(N,X) with N=(∂I+(S∖Ext)∖(S∖Ext))∪TN=\big(\partial I^+(S\setminus\mathrm{Ext})\setminus(S\setminus\mathrm{Ext})\big)\cup TN=(∂I+(S∖Ext)∖(S∖Ext))∪T: for every observer WWW from aaa (future-infinite timelike worldline or future-infinite null ray), with R=I−(W([a,∞)))R=I^-(W([a,\infty)))R=I−(W([a,∞))), if N∩R=∅N\cap R=\emptysetN∩R=∅ and some future-null geodesic segment γ([s,b))\gamma([s,b))γ([s,b)) starting at γ(s)=g0\gamma(s)=g_0γ(s)=g0​ lies in N∩∂RN\cap\partial RN∩∂R, then "entropy decreasing at g0g_0g0​ for XXX" implies "entropy decreasing at g0g_0g0​ for RRR".
  4. Fine-grained GSL: for every observer WWW from aaa, with RRR as above, and Cauchy surfaces Σ,Σ′\Sigma,\Sigma'Σ,Σ′ with Σ′⊆J+(Σ)\Sigma'\subseteq J^+(\Sigma)Σ′⊆J+(Σ): Sgen(Σ∩R)≤Sgen(Σ′∩R)S_{\rm gen}(\Sigma\cap R)\le S_{\rm gen}(\Sigma'\cap R)Sgen​(Σ∩R)≤Sgen​(Σ′∩R).

Conclusion. MMM is not null geodesically complete: there exist γ\gammaγ and a<ba<ba<b such that γ\gammaγ is a geodesic on (a,b)(a,b)(a,b) with nonzero null velocity throughout, and no geodesic defined on all of R\mathbb RR agrees with γ\gammaγ on (a,b)(a,b)(a,b).

The dimension of EEE is unrestricted. If E={0}E=\{0\}E={0}, no metric with g(τ,τ)<0g(\tau,\tau)<0g(τ,τ)<0 exists. If dim⁡E=1\dim E=1dimE=1 there are no nonzero null vectors, so null geodesic completeness holds trivially and the conclusion is false; in that case the theorem asserts that the hypotheses cannot all hold. No condition ties SgenS_{\rm gen}Sgen​ to the geometry beyond hypotheses 2–4.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Lucas · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paperProve2Me Team
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me