Accepted Hardy settings agree
ProvedQAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P47.accepted_settings_agreeprove2quantum
Let be a nonnegative binary conditional distribution normalized for each pair of settings, and let be a nonnegative normalized input law. The joint law is . Set , , and, when , let be the accepted setting law.
Assume and the two cross-setting zero constraints . Every unequal setting pair has zero joint acceptance mass, and
This gives perfect agreement of the raw setting bits under the ideal cross-setting constraints.
Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P47
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P47
open scoped ComplexConjugate
open scoped BigOperators
/-- II B, PDF p.3, using (1) on p.2: accepted settings agree with probability one.
No restriction to qubits, uniform inputs or a claim of secrecy is involved. -/
theorem accepted_settings_agree (p : Behavior) (w : PairLaw)
(hp : IsBehavior p) (hw : IsPairLaw w)
(h10 : p true false false false = 0) (h01 : p false true false false = 0)
(hs : 0 < siftingProbability p w) :
(∀ A B, A ≠ B → acceptedMass p w A B = 0) ∧
(∑ A, ∑ B, if A = B then acceptedLaw p w A B else 0) = 1 := by sorry
end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P47
Source
Device-independent quantum key distribution based on measurement inputs, arXiv:1308.6447v3, PDF p. 3, II B: perfect correlation of accepted settings
Read-back
What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol
For every function and function , where denotes false and true, assume for every choice of its four arguments and for every ; assume also for every pair and . If , , and
then for every , and
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.