Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Eq. (2.8): ηi∥r(xi)∥→0\eta_i \|r(x^i)\| \to 0ηi​∥r(xi)∥→0 along Algorithm 2.1

Proved
SolodovSvaiterVI.Alg21.eq2_8_tendsto_eta_residual

by mikedeng1 · Sep 29, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

p2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1projection-methodsvariational-inequalities

Let CCC be a closed convex subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^nRn and F:Rn→RnF : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^nF:Rn→Rn continuous. Assume the solution set SSS of VI(F,C)\mathrm{VI}(F, C)VI(F,C) is nonempty and condition (1.2) holds, and let γ,σ∈(0,1)\gamma, \sigma \in (0,1)γ,σ∈(0,1). Then for every sequence (xi)(x^i)(xi) generated by Algorithm 2.1, with stepsizes ηi=γki\eta_i = \gamma^{k_i}ηi​=γki​,

lim⁡i→∞ηi∥r(xi)∥=0.(2.8)\lim_{i \to \infty} \eta_i \|r(x^i)\| = 0. \tag{2.8}i→∞lim​ηi​∥r(xi)∥=0.(2.8)

This limit drives the final case analysis of the convergence proof: either the stepsizes stay away from zero along a subsequence, and then the residual vanishes along it, or the stepsizes tend to zero.

Formalization Note A run that stops at a solution is continued as a constant sequence (see IsAlg21Run); at such indices r(xi)=0r(x^i) = 0r(xi)=0, so the term is 000 whatever kik_iki​ is, and the stall encoding does not change the content.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_SolodovSvaiterVI_Alg21_viSol
import Definitions.Def_SolodovSvaiterVI_Alg21_SatisfiesCond12
import Definitions.Def_SolodovSvaiterVI_Alg21_residual
import Definitions.Def_SolodovSvaiterVI_Alg21_IsAlg21Run
Formal statement
namespace SolodovSvaiterVI.Alg21

/-- Solodov–Svaiter, proof of Theorem 2.1, (2.8) (p. 770): along any sequence generated by
Algorithm 2.1, `lim_{i→∞} ηᵢ ‖r(xⁱ)‖ = 0` with `ηᵢ = γ^{kᵢ}`.

**Formalization Note.** At stalled indices (`r(xⁱ) = 0`) the term is `0`, so the stall
encoding of termination does not change the content. -/
theorem eq2_8_tendsto_eta_residual {n : ℕ}
    (F : EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n) → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))
    (C : Set (EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n))) (hCc : IsClosed C) (hCcv : Convex ℝ C)
    (hF : Continuous F) (hS : (viSol F C).Nonempty) (h12 : SatisfiesCond12 F C)
    (gamma sigma : ℝ) (hγ0 : 0 < gamma) (hγ1 : gamma < 1) (hσ0 : 0 < sigma) (hσ1 : sigma < 1)
    (x : ℕ → EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin n)) (k : ℕ → ℕ) (hrun : IsAlg21Run F C gamma sigma x k) :
    Filter.Tendsto (fun i => gamma ^ (k i) * ‖residual F C (x i)‖) Filter.atTop (nhds 0) := by sorry

end SolodovSvaiterVI.Alg21
Source
Solodov & Svaiter, A New Projection Method for Variational Inequality Problems, SIAM J. Control Optim. 37 (1999), p. 770, proof of Theorem 2.1, Eq. (2.8)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me