Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

§III, unnumbered source/channel rate decomposition (15)–(17)

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76.rate_decomposition

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let S,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,Z be finite nonempty alphabets and let W(x,y,z∣s)W(x,y,z\mid s)W(x,y,z∣s) be a normalized discrete memoryless broadcast channel. All entropies and information quantities are in bits. For an input law ppp, information quantities below use exactly the induced law p(s)W(x,y,z∣s)p(s)W(x,y,z\mid s)p(s)W(x,y,z∣s).

For every normalized input distribution define Rch=I(S;Y)−I(S;Z)R_{\rm ch}=I(S;Y)-I(S;Z)Rch​=I(S;Y)−I(S;Z) and Rsrc=I(X;Y∣S)−I(X;Z∣S)R_{\rm src}=I(X;Y\mid S)-I(X;Z\mid S)Rsrc​=I(X;Y∣S)−I(X;Z∣S). Then

I(X,S;Y)−I(X,S;Z)=Rch+Rsrc.I(X,S;Y)-I(X,S;Z)=R_{\rm ch}+R_{\rm src}.I(X,S;Y)−I(X,S;Z)=Rch​+Rsrc​.

Neither summand is assumed nonnegative, and degradedness is unnecessary.

The identity separates the channel and residual-source contributions.

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P76
Formal statement
namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76

noncomputable section

open scoped BigOperators

open Filter Set

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable

-- Exact pinned primitives, inspected at their definitions before reuse.

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P56 (IsLaw)

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Frontier30.P12 (IsStochastic)

variable {S X Y Z : Type} [Fintype S] [Fintype X] [Fintype Y] [Fintype Z]
  [Nonempty S] [Nonempty X] [Nonempty Y] [Nonempty Z]

variable {n u w : ℕ}

/-- PDF p.5, (15)--(17): no degradedness or sign restrictions. -/
theorem rate_decomposition (W : DMBC S X Y Z) (p : S → ℝ) (hp : IsLaw p) :
    advantage W p = channelRate W p + residualSourceRate W p := by sorry

end

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P76
Source
The Sender-Excited Secret Key Agreement Model: Capacity, Reliability and Secrecy Exponents, arXiv:1107.4148v4, PDF p. 5, §III, unnumbered source/channel rate decomposition (15)–(17)
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For finite nonempty alphabets S,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,ZS,X,Y,Z, any conditional probability distributions Ws(x,y,z)W_s(x,y,z)Ws​(x,y,z), and any probability law p:S→Rp:S\to\mathbb Rp:S→R, meaning p(s)≥0p(s)\ge0p(s)≥0 and ∑sp(s)=1\sum_sp(s)=1∑s​p(s)=1, form the joint distribution p(s)Ws(x,y,z)p(s)W_s(x,y,z)p(s)Ws​(x,y,z). The declaration asserts the following equality of real numbers, with every information quantity measured in bits:

I((X,S);Y)−I((X,S);Z)=I(S;Y)−I(S;Z)+I(X;Y∣S)−I(X;Z∣S).I((X,S);Y)-I((X,S);Z) = I(S;Y)-I(S;Z) +I(X;Y\mid S)-I(X;Z\mid S).I((X,S);Y)−I((X,S);Z)=I(S;Y)−I(S;Z)+I(X;Y∣S)−I(X;Z∣S).

Here I(A;B)=H(A)+H(B)−H(A,B)I(A;B)=H(A)+H(B)-H(A,B)I(A;B)=H(A)+H(B)−H(A,B) and I(A;B∣C)=H(A,C)−H(C)−H(A,B,C)+H(B,C)I(A;B\mid C)=H(A,C)-H(C)-H(A,B,C)+H(B,C)I(A;B∣C)=H(A,C)−H(C)−H(A,B,C)+H(B,C), using the entropy of each indicated observation under that joint distribution. No cost condition or degradation hypothesis is assumed.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me