(109c), p. 25 — d⁻¹φ Σᵢ δᵢ²(‖σ‖ − m₁ + 2(‖σ‖ − σᵢ)) ≥ 0 for every σ ∈ ℝ^d
ProvedEJASpectral.RootDet.eq_109c_nonnegeigenvaluesinequalityp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1variance
Let , and . Write for the mean, , and for the Euclidean norm. Then
This scalar inequality is the final step of the proof of Proposition 7.1: by (105), (107) and (108), the compatibility condition (103) is equivalent to the nonnegativity of (109c).
Formalization Note is the Euclidean norm, written (not Lean's default sup norm on ). In the paper ; here it is any positive real.
Preamble
import Mathlib
Formal statement
namespace EJASpectral.RootDet
/-- (109c), p. 25: for `σ ∈ ℝ^d`, `φ > 0`, `m₁ = d⁻¹ Σᵢ σᵢ`, `δᵢ = σᵢ − m₁` and the
Euclidean norm `‖σ‖ = (Σᵢ σᵢ²)^{1/2}`, the quantity `d⁻¹ φ Σᵢ δᵢ² (‖σ‖ − m₁ + 2(‖σ‖ − σᵢ))` is
nonnegative. -/
theorem eq_109c_nonneg {d : ℕ} (hd : 0 < d) (σ : Fin d → ℝ) (φ : ℝ) (hφ : 0 < φ) :
0 ≤ ((d : ℝ))⁻¹ * φ *
∑ i, (σ i - ((d : ℝ))⁻¹ * ∑ j, σ j) ^ 2 *
(Real.sqrt (∑ j, σ j ^ 2) - ((d : ℝ))⁻¹ * ∑ j, σ j +
2 * (Real.sqrt (∑ j, σ j ^ 2) - σ i)) := by sorry
end EJASpectral.RootDet
Source
Coey, Kapelevich & Vielma, Conic optimization with spectral functions on Euclidean Jordan algebras, arXiv:2103.04104v2, p. 25, proof of Proposition 7.1, (109c) and the two sentences after it
Human review
Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).
Confirmed by the moderator at approval.