Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Proposition 1, p. 12 — informative A-Learning equilibrium iff θH/θL ≥ Δ

Proved
CustomerVoice.ALearn.proposition_1

by mikedeng1 · Oct 15, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

cheap-talkcustomizationp2o-batch-pfp2ap2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1separating-equilibriumthreshold

Consider Guo's two-type A-Learning customization game with θH>θL>0\theta_H>\theta_L>0θH​>θL​>0, α,γ∈(0,1)\alpha,\gamma\in(0,1)α,γ∈(0,1), and k,s>0k,s>0k,s>0. Buyers send costless messages, the seller chooses a nonnegative quality that maximizes its expected payoff given the message-induced belief, and each type chooses its best message. Informative communication means that the two types send different messages in a perfect Bayesian equilibrium.

Such an equilibrium exists if and only if

θHθL≥Δ=max⁡{γ[2s+(1+γ)k](1−γ)(2s+γk),2s+γkγk}.\frac{\theta_H}{\theta_L}\geq\Delta=\max\left\{\frac{\gamma[2s+(1+\gamma)k]}{(1-\gamma)(2s+\gamma k)},\frac{2s+\gamma k}{\gamma k}\right\}.θL​θH​​≥Δ=max{(1−γ)(2s+γk)γ[2s+(1+γ)k]​,γk2s+γk​}.

This characterizes when cheap talk can credibly reveal buyer preferences and support type-dependent customization.

Formalization Note The two-message game has on-path type-consistent beliefs, attained seller optimization over q≥0q\geq0q≥0, and buyer optimality against both messages. The price-setting stage is represented by equations (4)–(5). The weak boundary is included, as in Proposition 1.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_CustomerVoice_ALearn_Setting
Formal statement
namespace CustomerVoice.ALearn

/-- Proposition 1, p. 12: informative A-Learning communication exists exactly
above the printed heterogeneity threshold. -/
theorem proposition_1 (M : Model) (hM : M.Standing) :
    M.InformativeEq ↔ M.θH / M.θL ≥ M.Delta := by sorry

end CustomerVoice.ALearn
Source
Guo, The Voice of Customers in Customization, SSRN working paper 3994319 (version of 2023-11-29, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3994319), p. 12, Proposition 1
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 16, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me