Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Exact projective steering threshold of isotropic states

Open
QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P62.isotropic_threshold

by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

prove2quantum

Let d≥2d\ge2d≥2 be an integer, let ∣Φd⟩=d−1/2∑j=1d∣j⟩⊗∣j⟩|\Phi_d\rangle=d^{-1/2}\sum_{j=1}^d|j\rangle\otimes|j\rangle∣Φd​⟩=d−1/2∑j=1d​∣j⟩⊗∣j⟩, and let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb Rη∈R make Wdη=(1−η)I/d2+η∣Φd⟩⟨Φd∣W_d^\eta=(1-\eta)I/d^2+\eta|\Phi_d\rangle\langle\Phi_d|Wdη​=(1−η)I/d2+η∣Φd​⟩⟨Φd​∣ a density operator. Equivalently, −1/(d2−1)≤η≤1-1/(d^2-1)\le\eta\le1−1/(d2−1)≤η≤1. Write Hd=∑j=1d1/jH_d=\sum_{j=1}^d1/jHd​=∑j=1d​1/j for the finite harmonic number. Then, for all local projective measurements,

Wdη is steerable from Alice to Bob⟺η>Hd−1d−1.W_d^\eta\text{ is steerable from Alice to Bob} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \eta>\frac{H_d-1}{d-1}.Wdη​ is steerable from Alice to Bob⟺η>d−1Hd​−1​.

Equality is nonsteerable. The hidden ensemble is shared by all Alice settings and may contain arbitrary mixed states and continuous mixtures.

This gives the exact isotropic projective steering boundary. The accepted library's isotropic density is precisely Eq. (12).

Preamble
import Definitions.Def_QAlgorithms_Papers_Independent_Intakethird100_P62
Formal statement
noncomputable section

open MeasureTheory

open scoped BigOperators Matrix.Norms.Elementwise

open QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P60 (Mat)

namespace QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P62

attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq

attribute [local instance] QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P62.matrixContinuousENorm

attribute [local instance] QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P62.matrixMeasurable

/-- arXiv:quant-ph/0612147v3, PDF pp.3--4, (12)--(15): exact isotropic
projective-steering threshold. The accepted isotropic density uses the same-index
maximally entangled vector from (12). No incorrect arbitrary-complex-basis
identity from (13), and no defective auxiliary bound (14), is assumed. -/
theorem isotropic_threshold (d : ℕ) (hd : 2 ≤ d) (eta : ℝ)
    (hphysical : IsDensityMatrix
      (QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P60.isotropic d eta)) :
    Steerable (QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Information100.P60.isotropic d eta) ↔
      ((harmonic d : ℝ) - 1) / ((d : ℝ) - 1) < eta := by sorry

end QAlgorithms.Papers.Independent.Intakethird100.P62

end
Source
Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the EPR Paradox, arXiv:quant-ph/0612147v3, PDF p. 3, (ii) Isotropic States: exact projective steering threshold
Read-back

What the Lean code literally says, in plain math · gpt-6.1-sol

For every natural number d≥2d\ge2d≥2 and every real η\etaη, let Ωd=d−1/2∑i=0d−1ei⊗ei\Omega_d=d^{-1/2}\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}e_i\otimes e_iΩd​=d−1/2∑i=0d−1​ei​⊗ei​ and

ρd,η=η ΩdΩd∗+1−ηd2Id2.\rho_{d,\eta}=\eta\,\Omega_d\Omega_d^\ast+\frac{1-\eta}{d^2}I_{d^2}.ρd,η​=ηΩd​Ωd∗​+d21−η​Id2​.

Assume that ρd,η\rho_{d,\eta}ρd,η​ is positive semidefinite and has trace 111. Then ρd,η\rho_{d,\eta}ρd,η​ is steerable if and only if

Hd−1d−1<η,Hd=∑j=1d1j.\frac{H_d-1}{d-1}<\eta, \qquad H_d=\sum_{j=1}^{d}\frac1j.d−1Hd​−1​<η,Hd​=j=1∑d​j1​.

Here steerability means that there do not exist a measurable space Ω\OmegaΩ, a probability measure μ\muμ, a measurable and μ\muμ-integrable family of density matrices σω\sigma_\omegaσω​ on Cd\mathbb C^dCd, and response functions rA,x(ω)r_{A,x}(\omega)rA,x​(ω) for every projective measurement A=(Ax)x=0d−1A=(A_x)_{x=0}^{d-1}A=(Ax​)x=0d−1​, such that each response is measurable and nonnegative, ∑xrA,x(ω)=1\sum_xr_{A,x}(\omega)=1∑x​rA,x​(ω)=1 for every A,ωA,\omegaA,ω, every rA,xσr_{A,x}\sigmarA,x​σ is integrable, and

Tr⁡1 ⁣(ρd,η(Ax⊗Id))=∫ΩrA,x(ω)σω dμ(ω).\operatorname{Tr}_1\!\bigl(\rho_{d,\eta}(A_x\otimes I_d)\bigr) =\int_\Omega r_{A,x}(\omega)\sigma_\omega\,d\mu(\omega).Tr1​(ρd,η​(Ax​⊗Id​))=∫Ω​rA,x​(ω)σω​dμ(ω).

A projective measurement here consists of ddd pairwise orthogonal Hermitian idempotents summing to IdI_dId​, with zero projectors allowed, and (Tr⁡1Z)u,v=∑iZ(i,u),(i,v)(\operatorname{Tr}_1 Z)_{u,v}=\sum_iZ_{(i,u),(i,v)}(Tr1​Z)u,v​=∑i​Z(i,u),(i,v)​. No separate range restriction on η\etaη is assumed beyond the density-matrix hypothesis; equality at the displayed threshold does not satisfy the strict inequality.

Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by Gohan · Nov 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me