Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

Section 7 — the iterates of Dimension Reduction stay in H\mathcal HH and their supports shrink

Proved
MarkovChainChoice.DimReduction.iterate_invariants

by mikedeng1 · Sep 28, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

algorithmschoice-modelsconvex-decompositionp2o-batch-p200bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1

Let (λ,ρ)(\lambda,\rho)(λ,ρ) be a Markov chain choice model satisfying the standing assumptions, let (x^,z^)∈H(\hat x,\hat z)\in\mathcal H(x^,z^)∈H, and run the Dimension Reduction algorithm from (x1,z1)=(x^,z^)(x^1,z^1)=(\hat x,\hat z)(x1,z1)=(x^,z^). Let k≥1k\ge1k≥1 be an iteration reached by the algorithm, i.e. the algorithm did not stop at any iteration lll with 1≤l<k1\le l<k1≤l<k. Then

  1. (xk,zk)∈H(x^k,z^k)\in\mathcal H(xk,zk)∈H;
  2. if the algorithm does not stop at iteration kkk either, then for every jk∈Skj^k\in S^kjk∈Sk attaining αk=min⁡{xjk/Pj,Sk:j∈Sk}\alpha^k=\min\{x^k_j/P_{j,S^k}: j\in S^k\}αk=min{xjk​/Pj,Sk​:j∈Sk},
Sk+1⊆Sk∖{jk}.S^{k+1}\subseteq S^k\setminus\{j^k\}.Sk+1⊆Sk∖{jk}.

These invariants give the termination bound and the nesting of the offer sets in Theorem 9.

Formalization Note The paper states the induction for (x^,z^)(\hat x,\hat z)(x^,z^) the optimal solution of (Reduced), using only that it lies in H\mathcal HH; the statement here assumes (x^,z^)∈H(\hat x,\hat z)\in\mathcal H(x^,z^)∈H, which every feasible solution of (Reduced) satisfies. "Stops at iteration lll" means Sl=∅S^l=\emptysetSl=∅ (Step 1) or αl=1\alpha^l=1αl=1 (Step 2).

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainChoice_Shared_Model
import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainChoice_Shared_Balance
import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainChoice_DimReduction_H
import Definitions.Def_MarkovChainChoice_DimReduction_Algorithm
open MarkovChainChoice.Shared
Formal statement
namespace MarkovChainChoice.DimReduction

theorem iterate_invariants {n : ℕ} (M : Model n) (x z : Fin n → ℝ) (hxz : (x, z) ∈ H M)
    (k : ℕ) (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hrun : ∀ l, 1 ≤ l → l < k → ¬ drStops M x z l) :
    drIter M x z k ∈ H M ∧
      (¬ drStops M x z k → ∀ j ∈ drS M x z k,
        (drIter M x z k).1 j / purchase M (drS M x z k) j = drA M x z k →
        drS M x z (k + 1) ⊆ (drS M x z k).erase j) := by sorry

end MarkovChainChoice.DimReduction
Source
Feldman, Topaloglu, Revenue Management Under the Markov Chain Choice Model, Oper. Res. 65(5), 2017, pp. 1333–1334, Section 7, paragraph after the Dimension Reduction algorithm
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 1, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me