Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Formalpedia

(45) — the minimizer of DiD_iDi​ on ∣βi∣≤λ0/λ2|\beta_i|\le\sqrt{\lambda_0/\lambda_2}∣βi​∣≤λ0​/λ2​​

Proved
L0BnB.Duality.eq_45

by mikedeng1 · Oct 8, 2026 · Mathlib 0df444a (Lean v4.33.1)

lagrangian-dualityp2o-batch-pfp2bp2o-gran-per-chapterp2o-plan-paperp2o-v1reverse-huber

Let λ0,λ2>0\lambda_0,\lambda_2>0λ0​,λ2​>0, let a∈Ra\in\mathbb Ra∈R (standing for αTXi\alpha^TX_iαTXi​) and η≥0\eta\ge 0η≥0 (a multiplier ηi\eta_iηi​), and let D(b)=ψ1(b;λ0,λ2)+ab+η∣b∣D(b)=\psi_1(b;\lambda_0,\lambda_2)+ab+\eta|b|D(b)=ψ1​(b;λ0​,λ2​)+ab+η∣b∣. Set

β~={0if 2λ0λ2+η−∣a∣≥0,−λ0/λ2 sign(a)otherwise.\tilde\beta=\begin{cases}0 & \text{if } 2\sqrt{\lambda_0\lambda_2}+\eta-|a|\ge 0,\\ -\sqrt{\lambda_0/\lambda_2}\,\mathrm{sign}(a) & \text{otherwise.}\end{cases}β~​={0−λ0​/λ2​​sign(a)​if 2λ0​λ2​​+η−∣a∣≥0,otherwise.​

Then ∣β~∣≤λ0/λ2|\tilde\beta|\le\sqrt{\lambda_0/\lambda_2}∣β~​∣≤λ0​/λ2​​ and

D(β~)≤D(b)for every b with ∣b∣≤λ0/λ2.D(\tilde\beta)\le D(b)\qquad\text{for every } b \text{ with } |b|\le\sqrt{\lambda_0/\lambda_2}.D(β~​)≤D(b)for every b with ∣b∣≤λ0​/λ2​​.

This is Case 1 of the inner minimization in the proof of Theorem 2: on this interval ψ1(b)=2λ0λ2∣b∣\psi_1(b)=2\sqrt{\lambda_0\lambda_2}|b|ψ1​(b)=2λ0​λ2​​∣b∣, so DDD is piecewise linear.

Formalization Note The paper's "argmin" is stated as membership in the interval plus minimality over it; uniqueness is not claimed. η≥0\eta\ge 0η≥0 is the sign constraint of the multipliers in (43). sign is Real.sign; in the second case ∣a∣>2λ0λ2>0|a|>2\sqrt{\lambda_0\lambda_2}>0∣a∣>2λ0​λ2​​>0, so sign(0) does not arise there.

Preamble
import Mathlib
import Definitions.Def_L0BnB_Duality_Dual
Formal statement
namespace L0BnB.Duality

/-- (45), proof of Theorem 2, p. 31 (Case 1: `|βᵢ| ≤ √(λ₀/λ₂)`). For `a = αᵀXᵢ` and `η = ηᵢ ≥ 0`,
the point `β̃*ᵢ` of (45) lies in `[−√(λ₀/λ₂), √(λ₀/λ₂)]` and minimizes
`Dᵢ(βᵢ) = ψ₁(βᵢ; λ₀, λ₂) + a βᵢ + η|βᵢ|` over that interval. -/
theorem eq_45 (lam0 lam2 a η : ℝ) (hlam0 : 0 < lam0) (hlam2 : 0 < lam2) (hη : 0 ≤ η) :
    betaTilde45 lam0 lam2 a η ∈ Set.Icc (-Real.sqrt (lam0 / lam2)) (Real.sqrt (lam0 / lam2)) ∧
      ∀ b ∈ Set.Icc (-Real.sqrt (lam0 / lam2)) (Real.sqrt (lam0 / lam2)),
        D lam0 lam2 a η (betaTilde45 lam0 lam2 a η) ≤ D lam0 lam2 a η b := by sorry

end L0BnB.Duality
Source
Hazimeh, Mazumder, Saab, Sparse Regression at Scale: Branch-and-Bound rooted in First-Order Optimization, arXiv:2004.06152v2, p. 31, Proof of Theorem 2, Case 1, (45)
Human review
  • Endorsed by Shuze Chen · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the moderator at approval.

  • Endorsed by mikedeng1 · Oct 8, 2026

    Confirmed by the mission captain (proposal self-audit).

View graph

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me