Prove2Me
Navigate
DiscoverCollectionsFormalpediaBlogsUsersMomentumMy Missions+
Prove2Me
⌕
Log in
← Collections

OAI Math

All of openAI's results.

https://github.com/openai/math

317 missions

Missions

201–220 of 317
Open150Completed167All317
AnalysisHarmonic Analysis·Captain: marwahaha

Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimensionOpen Problem

Motivation

Singular integral estimates can detect geometric regularity in a measure whose support has no given parametrization. The mission turns a uniform Riesz-transform bound into uniform pieces of Lipschitz images. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

Let μ be a regular measure in ℝᵈ, with d≥4 and 2≤n≤d−2. Ahlfors–David regularity means that μ(B(x,r)) is comparable to rⁿ on its support at admissible radii. Hard-truncated Riesz transforms use the kernel (x−y)/|x−y|^(n+1), excluding distances at most ε.

Formalization target

With fixed dimension and bounds C_AD,C_R, prove that there exist θ>0 and M≥0 such that every eligible μ satisfies

μ(B(x,r)∩range⁡g)≥θrn\mu(B(x,r)\cap\operatorname{range}g)\ge\theta r^nμ(B(x,r)∩rangeg)≥θrn

for some M-Lipschitz map g from the open n-dimensional radius-r ball, at every support point and admissible radius.

The selected formal target is OAI.RieszRectifiability.quantitative_higher_codimension_riesz_rectifiability.

Significance and status

The constants θ and M are uniform across the entire class of measures with the prescribed analytic bounds. This is the exact quantitative ball-image conclusion. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Individual rectifiable pieces with constants depending on μ do not yield this quantifier order. The Riesz bound ranges over every positive hard truncation and every scalar L² input.

Formalization scope

Ambient space is EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d). Radii are positive and bounded by the extended support diameter. The hypothesis uses μ.Regular, nonnegative Riesz constants, MemLp and eLpNorm; the conclusion uses the actual measure of the intersection with a Lipschitz image. No endpoint codimensions are included.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
2 thms1 active userReviewed
🏆Completed
AnalysisCombinatorics·Captain: marwahaha

The dyadic case of the Erdős similarity conjectureOpen Problem

Motivation

Finite patterns fit inside positive-measure sets after a sufficiently small affine change. The dyadic similarity problem asks whether one particular infinite pattern can be excluded even from compact sets of nearly full measure. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

The dyadic sequence is D={2⁻ⁿ:n≥1}. Its affine copies are x+sD with arbitrary x∈ℝ and nonzero signed scale s. The ambient measure is Lebesgue measure on the real line.

Formalization target

For every 0<η<1, construct a compact E⊆[0,1] with

∣E∣>1−η,∀x∈R  ∀s≠0  ∃n≥1,x+s2−n∉E.|E|>1-\eta,\qquad\forall x\in\mathbb R\;\forall s\ne0\;\exists n\ge1,\quad x+s2^{-n}\notin E.∣E∣>1−η,∀x∈R∀s=0∃n≥1,x+s2−n∈/E.

The same E must avoid every translation and both signs of dilation.

The selected formal target is OAI.Problem310.dyadic_affine_avoidance.

Significance and status

The result concerns the dyadic sequence specifically, with a stronger near-full-measure conclusion than merely finding one positive-measure avoiding set. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Excluding a countable collection of copies does not handle the continuum of scales and centers. Finite initial segments cannot replace the entire sequence.

Formalization scope

The definition dyadicPoint accepts n=0, but the theorem explicitly chooses n≥1. Measure is ENNReal-valued and compares with ENNReal.ofReal(1−η). Compactness and interval containment are required conclusions. General infinite sets are outside this selected target.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, The dyadic case of the Erdős similarity conjecture, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
48 thms2 active usersReviewed
AnalysisDiscrete Geometry·Captain: marwahaha

The symmetric Mahler conjecture and its equality casesOpen Problem

Motivation

The volume of a symmetric convex body multiplied by the volume of its polar is unchanged by invertible linear coordinates. Its extremizers are therefore classified up to linear equivalence. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

For an origin-symmetric compact convex K⊆ℝⁿ with nonempty interior, the polar body K° consists of p with Σpᵢxᵢ≤1 for every x∈K. Hanner bodies are generated from centered nondegenerate intervals by products and convex joins; linear Hanner bodies also allow invertible linear images.

Formalization target

For n≥1, prove the equality classification

∣K∣ ∣K∘∣=4nn!⟺K is a linear Hanner body.|K|\,|K^\circ|=\frac{4^n}{n!}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad K\text{ is a linear Hanner body}.∣K∣∣K∘∣=n!4n​⟺K is a linear Hanner body.

The lower-bound inequality is retained as a separate supporting target.

The selected formal target is OAI.SymmetricMahler.symmetric_mahler_equality.

Significance and status

The goal identifies every equality case, not only one minimizing example. The manuscript’s inequality and equality assertions appear as distinct published statements. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Showing that the recursively constructed examples attain the value gives only one implication. The reverse implication must classify arbitrary symmetric convex bodies, including nonpolyhedral inputs.

Formalization scope

Points are functions Fin n→ℝ and polarity uses the coordinate dot product. Volumes are converted from ENNReal to ℝ in the product. The two definition groups both declare coordinatePolar; they remain separate references rather than an aggregate module.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, The symmetric Mahler conjecture and its equality cases, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
4 thms1 active userReviewed
Discrete Geometry·Captain: marwahaha

A single-lattice covering bound of order n log nOpen Problem

Motivation

Covering Euclidean space with translates of one body becomes more restrictive when every center must lie in a single lattice. The mission asks for a density bound with the optimal-order n log n shape claimed in the manuscript. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A convex body is compact and convex with nonempty interior. A full lattice L is a discrete integer submodule spanning the real coordinate space. It covers by K when K+L=ℝⁿ, and its covering density is volume(K)/covolume(L).

Formalization target

Establish one absolute constant C>0 with

∀n≥2  ∀K,∃L,K+L=Rn,∣K∣covol⁡(L)≤Cnlog⁡n.\forall n\ge2\;\forall K,\quad\exists L,\quad K+L=\mathbb R^n,\qquad\frac{|K|}{\operatorname{covol}(L)}\le Cn\log n.∀n≥2∀K,∃L,K+L=Rn,covol(L)∣K∣​≤Cnlogn.

The lattice may depend on K and n.

The selected formal target is OAI.SingleLatticeCovering.single_lattice_covering.

Significance and status

The centers form one full-rank lattice. The target includes no symmetry or boundary smoothness assumption on K. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A union of a few lattice cosets is not itself the required single lattice. Density control must accompany exact coverage of every point.

Formalization scope

The formal theorem explicitly supplies DiscreteTopology L and IsZLattice ℝ L in addition to the integer submodule. It uses Mathlib lattice covolume, real volume and the natural logarithm. Dimension starts at two, and the universal C is chosen before K and n.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, A single-lattice covering bound of order n log n, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
2 thms1 active userReviewed
Discrete Geometry·Captain: marwahaha

Translative covering densities of order n log nOpen Problem

Motivation

The worst covering density over convex bodies measures how much overlap is unavoidable when translations must cover all of space. Comparing unrestricted centers with a single lattice separates two geometric constraints. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

The translative density θ_T(K) is the infimum of volume(K) times the upper intensity of locally finite covering center sets. Intensity is measured in expanding centered cubes. The lattice density θ_L(K) takes the corresponding infimum over discrete full-rank lattice coverings.

Formalization target

For each of the four suprema Aₙ, over all or centrally symmetric convex bodies and using θ_T or θ_L, prove common positive constants c,C and a threshold n₀ with

cnlog⁡n≤An≤Cnlog⁡n(n≥n0).cn\log n\le A_n\le Cn\log n\qquad(n\ge n_0).cnlogn≤An​≤Cnlogn(n≥n0​).

The selected formal target is OAI.CoveringOrder.optimal_order.

Significance and status

The selected endpoint asserts the same asymptotic order for all four worst-case quantities. The manuscript’s new translative lower-bound claim is part of this broader packaged endpoint. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A lower bound for lattice centers does not exclude a more efficient nonlattice cover. The unrestricted lower bound ranges over every locally finite covering set.

Formalization scope

The definitions retain extended nonnegative real densities and suprema, so a finite upper bound also asserts finiteness. Central symmetry may have any center. The theorem concerns suprema over bodies, not a lower bound on every individual body.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Translative covering densities of order n log n, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
2 thms1 active userReviewed
🏆Completed
AlgebraConvex Optimization·Captain: marwahaha

A nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity coneOpen Problem

Motivation

Hyperbolic polynomials define convex optimization regions through real-rooted line restrictions. A spectrahedral representation would describe the same region by one finite symmetric positive-semidefinite matrix inequality. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

The formal ambient space consists of two real symmetric 4×4 matrices X,Z and a vector y∈ℝ³. A fixed determinant expression defines a multivariate polynomial p. At e=((I,I),0), the cone consists of x for which every complex root of t↦p(te−x) is real and nonnegative.

Formalization target

Prove dim(ambient)=23, p(e)=1, and

p is homogeneous of degree 20,deg⁡p=20,p\text{ is homogeneous of degree }20,\qquad\deg p=20,p is homogeneous of degree 20,degp=20,

with every line polynomial real-rooted. For every N>0 and linear symmetric pencil L, prove

cone⁡(p,e)≠{x:L(x)⪰0}.\operatorname{cone}(p,e)\ne\{x:L(x)\succeq0\}.cone(p,e)={x:L(x)⪰0}.

The selected formal target is OAI.Paper256.main_result.

Significance and status

The formal target rules out every finite homogeneous real symmetric pencil size. It also verifies the algebraic and root properties of its fixed polynomial. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Excluding one determinantal expression is weaker than excluding all matrix-inequality representations of the cone. The final universal quantifier ranges over all positive dimensions and all real linear pencils.

Formalization scope

The published Lean formula has asserted degree 20. The manuscript abstract describes degree 16; this draft follows the actual published degree-20 statement rather than substituting the manuscript number. Symmetric matrices use selfAdjoint, and positivity is Matrix.PosSemidef. No affine pencil or projected semidefinite lift is asserted here.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, A nonspectrahedral hyperbolicity cone, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
35 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
AnalysisTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Tree Constructions for the l1 Distortion of Binary Edit DistanceOpen Problem

Motivation

Embedding edit distance into ℓ₁ would permit algorithms and geometric tools for that normed space. Distortion lower bounds quantify the loss any such representation must incur. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

Edit distance is the least number of unit insertions, deletions and substitutions, with unrestricted intermediate word lengths. For a finite equal-length binary set W, c₁(W) is the infimum over all injective maps into the full real sequence space ℓ₁ of the product of the two worst distance ratios.

Formalization target

Find an absolute c>0 and d₀ such that for every d≥d₀ there are 1≤n≤d and at least two binary words of length n with

c1(W)≥exp⁡ ⁣(clog⁡d log⁡log⁡d).c_1(W)\ge\exp\!\left(c\sqrt{\log d\,\log\log d}\right).c1​(W)≥exp(clogdloglogd​).

The selected formal target is OAI.TreeEdit.binary_lower_bound.

Significance and status

The witness exists for every sufficiently large length cap. The target bounds distortion against every injective ℓ₁ embedding, not only a particular algorithm. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A bad map is not a lower bound for the infimum over all maps. The finite family must force distortion uniformly while preserving its common binary word length.

Formalization scope

The chosen target uses Word Bool n and Finset witnesses. A companion binary_torus formulation is retained as a reference to the same lower-bound endpoint. Its independent source group repeats edit-distance declarations and is not combined into one import. No companion upper embedding theorem is attached.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Tree Constructions for the l1 Distortion of Binary Edit Distance, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
70 thms3 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
Discrete Geometry·Captain: marwahaha

Finite angular cylinder covers below the half-area boundOpen Problem

Motivation

Cylinder covers measure coverage cost by perpendicular base area. For a regular tetrahedron, the familiar half-minimum-shadow threshold is tested by a finite family of tilted triangular cylinders. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

The reference tetrahedron K has coordinates (x,y,√2t) with 0≤t≤1, |x|≤1−t and |y|≤t. Let H=√2 and A_min be its least unit-direction projection area. A triangular cylinder has a compact nondegenerate triangle in the plane perpendicular to its unit axis.

Formalization target

Prove A_min=H and construct, for every sufficiently small ε>0, 2⌈2/ε²⌉ cylinders covering K with

∑i∣Bi∣H=12−136000ε2+O(ε4),∑i∣Bi∣<Amin⁡2.\frac{\sum_i|B_i|}{H}=\frac12-\frac{13}{6000}\varepsilon^2+O(\varepsilon^4),\qquad\sum_i|B_i|<\frac{A_{\min}}2.H∑i​∣Bi​∣​=21​−600013​ε2+O(ε4),i∑​∣Bi​∣<2Amin​​.

Also prove existence of a finite cover with Σᵢ|Bᵢ|/shadowArea(uᵢ)<1/2.

The selected formal target is OAI.TriangularCovering.main.

Significance and status

The asymptotic estimate retains its explicit quadratic coefficient and uniform fourth-order error. Both absolute area and directionwise normalized cost are formal conclusions. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Tilting may reduce projected area but leave uncovered gaps. The target requires exact finite coverage and valid triangular bases together with the strict cost saving.

Formalization scope

Base area is two-dimensional Euclidean Hausdorff measure converted to ℝ. MainAsymptotic has fixed positive δ,C before all small ε. The broad fourPaperMain is retained as a related published reference; the selected goal remains TriangularCovering.main. Repeated definitions in independent source groups are kept separate.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Finite angular cylinder covers below the half-area bound, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
22 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
AnalysisDiscrete Geometry·Captain: marwahaha

Finite cylinder approximation of ruled setsOpen Problem

Motivation

A continuously varying family of line segments suggests a low-cost cylinder cover, but a finite approximation must control both gaps and accumulated base area. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A ruled set consists of segments (s,p+sv(p)) with p in a compact planar label set D and |s|≤L. The basic weighted projection cost is ∫_D(1+|v(p)|²)^(-1/2)dp. The source also defines physical rescalings, square intercept tiles and singular slope fields.

Formalization target

Prove the published FullMain conjunction. Its central finite-approximation clause gives

∑i∣Bi∣≤∫Ddp1+∣v(p)∣2+ε\sum_i |B_i|\le\int_D\frac{dp}{\sqrt{1+|v(p)|^2}}+\varepsiloni∑​∣Bi​∣≤∫D​1+∣v(p)∣2​dp​+ε

for every ε>0 under its C¹ hyperbolicity hypotheses. The package additionally contains physical-rescaling, logarithmic, product-cell, orthogonal-grid, smooth nilpotent and singular-tetrahedron assertions.

The selected formal target is OAI.RuledApproximation.fullMain.

Significance and status

The chosen goal supplies a package of finite-cover results with explicit regularity and base-shape requirements. The broad fourPaperMain reference also contains a C¹ nilpotent variant. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Freezing directions can create gaps and a persistent area loss. The final family must be finite and cover every point while the area error is arbitrarily small.

Formalization scope

FullMain uses Euclidean planes and three-space. Some clauses require null-measure boundary or C² regularity; its NilpotentStatement requires smoothness and a square-zero derivative. The singular clause includes its stated p,γ ranges and strict tetrahedron cost below √2/2. These are the selected published clauses; the manuscript’s latest C¹ formulation is not silently substituted for them. Independent definition groups remain separate references.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Finite cylinder approximation of ruled sets, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
30 thms2 active usersReviewed
AnalysisDiscrete Geometry·Captain: marwahaha

Slope-field perturbations of the two-cylinder coveringOpen Problem

Motivation

A slope-field perturbation of a two-cylinder cover trades a reduction in projected area against the extra overlap needed to maintain coverage. The slope-field manuscript studies when the net cost becomes strictly smaller. The companion radial-sweep manuscript establishes finite triangular approximation with arbitrary tagged equal subdivisions. Both manuscripts map to the same published Lean goal, so this draft covers their shared target. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A cylinder is a measurable finite-area planar base plus a line in its perpendicular unit direction. Ruled sets vary the segment direction over compact planar labels. Radial sweeps use p₀+ρ(a+tb)+s(e+w(t)), with 0≤ρ≤R(t), |s|≤L, and w′(t)=λ(t)(a+tb).

Formalization target

Prove the seven-part fourPaperMain conjunction: the explicit angular-area construction; C¹ hyperbolic approximation; C¹ square-zero-derivative approximation; regular-tetrahedron counterexamples with parallelogram bases and with bounded open bases; aligned radial triangular approximation; and actual-sweep projection bounds. In particular, the tetrahedron clauses require

∑i∣Bi∣<12Amin⁡(K),∑i∣Bi∣∣πui⊥K∣<12.\sum_i|B_i|<\frac12 A_{\min}(K),\qquad\sum_i\frac{|B_i|}{|\pi_{u_i^\perp}K|}<\frac12.i∑​∣Bi​∣<21​Amin​(K),i∑​∣πui⊥​​K∣∣Bi​∣​<21​.

The selected formal target is OAI.CylinderCovering.fourPaperMain.

Significance and status

The selected published goal is a joint endpoint shared by four related manuscripts, and therefore includes more than the slope-field application alone. Its finite covers retain both cost inequalities. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A local area decrease cannot guarantee a global cover. All regularity, exact coverage and error bounds in the separate conjuncts must hold in their stated regimes.

Formalization scope

Hyperbolic and nilpotent clauses use their C¹ definitions; radial data require a nonempty parameter interval, positive segment half-length, continuous nonnegative cap and alignment derivative. All tagged equal subdivisions are covered. The radial clause requires triangular-base area to converge to weightedArea(D), while actual sweep projections have eventual cost at most weightedArea(D)+ε and the corresponding limsup bound. The separate RuledApproximation.fullMain is also retained as a related reference but is not mislabeled as one of these seven conjuncts.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Finite triangular approximation of radial sweeps, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, Slope-field perturbations of the two-cylinder covering, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
30 thms2 active usersReviewed
Algorithmic Game TheoryTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Randomized quasipolynomial-time mean-payoff gamesOpen Problem

Motivation

Mean-payoff games ask which starting positions allow a player to guarantee a nonnegative long-run average reward. Binary-encoded weights make the bit cost of solving the complete winning set a central part of the question. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A game is a finite nonempty directed multigraph with integer edge weights, an owner for each vertex and an outgoing edge everywhere. Winning means that a history-dependent maximizer strategy guarantees liminf average payoff at least zero against every opponent strategy.

Formalization target

Construct one randomized three-tape machine and C>0 such that every encoded game of length L has a time bound

T≤2C(log⁡2(L+2))2,T\le2^{C(\log_2(L+2))^2},T≤2C(log2​(L+2))2,

all T-bit random tapes halt by T, and at least 7/8 of them output the exact winning-set indicator, with all other output cells blank.

The selected formal target is OAI.randomized_quasipolynomial_mean_payoff.

Significance and status

The target makes the input encoding, computation model, success fraction and complete output explicit. It is an existence theorem for a uniform machine, not a separate solver for each game. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

The running time must hold on every random tape, while correctness holds on the specified fraction. Signed weights and the full binary input length cannot be replaced by unary magnitude bounds.

Formalization scope

The published definitions specify games, strategies, plays, liminf payoffs, serialization and tape transitions. The independent finite Truffet elimination counterexample is retained as contextual reference; it is not a prerequisite or an asserted proof of the randomized algorithm. The manuscript’s certification/always-correct consequence is not an additional attached goal.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Randomized quasipolynomial-time mean-payoff games, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
4 thms2 active usersReviewed
Linear algebraTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Complex Matrix Multiplication Below 2.258 and Rectangular BoundsOpen Problem

Motivation

Rectangular matrix products arise when the two outer dimensions are much larger than the inner dimension. The dual exponent records the largest inner growth rate compatible with arithmetic exponent two. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

For k∈[0,1], ω_ℂ(1,k,1) is the infimum of exponents for multiplying an n×⌈nᵏ⌉ matrix by a ⌈nᵏ⌉×n matrix over ℂ. The dual exponent α is the supremum of k for which this infimum equals two.

Formalization target

Prove the strict bound

αC>93200=0.465.\alpha_{\mathbb C}>\frac{93}{200}=0.465.αC​>20093​=0.465.

The additional published rectangular endpoint asserts ω_ℂ(1,709/1000,1)<523/250=2.092.

The selected formal target is OAI.MatrixMultiplication.complex_alpha_gt_93_div_200.

Significance and status

Strictness is part of both statements. The supplied goal concerns the complex dual exponent; the manuscript title’s square bound and broader field claims are not attached formal targets. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

An algorithm for one size does not establish an asymptotic exponent. The definition quantifies over every positive slack and all positive sizes with one bound constant for each slack.

Formalization scope

Algorithms are division-free arithmetic programs with constants and input gates of cost zero and addition, subtraction and multiplication of cost one. Correctness is quantified over all input matrices. The dual exponent is a real supremum of exact exponent-two shapes, using the prescribed inner-dimension ceiling.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Complex Matrix Multiplication Below 2.258 and Rectangular Bounds, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
3 thms1 active userReviewed
🏆Completed
ProbabilityTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

One Sample Suffices for Matroid Prophet Inequalities against an Almighty AdversaryOpen Problem

Motivation

Online selection must commit before all values arrive, while the offline optimum sees the full vector. The mission asks how much one independent sample per item can recover under a matroid feasibility constraint. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A matroid on Fin n specifies feasible independent subsets. An online rule sees the full initial sample vector, a finite random seed and the arriving label/value prefix. Sample and value coordinates are jointly independent, corresponding marginals agree, and the seed is independent of all of them.

Formalization target

For every labeled matroid, construct a distribution-independent rule and seed law such that every prefix is feasible and, for every measurable arrival permutation,

E[reward⁡]≥2−310E[OPT⁡].\mathbb E[\operatorname{reward}]\ge2^{-310}\mathbb E[\operatorname{OPT}].E[reward]≥2−310E[OPT].

The arrival order may depend on all samples, all values and the entire seed. Reward integrability is also required.

The selected formal target is OAI.MatroidProphet.one_sample.

Significance and status

The rule and its seed distribution depend only on the known matroid. The allowed adversary is stronger than an order chosen before the values or random seed are revealed. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Independence of the input coordinates does not imply independence of the adversarial order. The guarantee must survive an order selected with full information while decisions remain irrevocable.

Formalization scope

Values are nonnegative almost surely, and only the actual offline optimum is assumed integrable. The hidden-vector target with ratio 2⁻²⁹³ provides an available supporting milestone. The duplicated one-sample formulation and secretary consequence remain references in their independent source group.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, One Sample Suffices for Matroid Prophet Inequalities against an Almighty Adversary, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
9 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
AlgebraTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

One Rational Matrix Hitting Point for Noncommutative FormulasOpen Problem

Motivation

Testing a noncommutative polynomial at scalar points can lose its ordered-word structure. Matrix evaluation preserves noncommutativity and permits a single prescribed tuple to test an entire bounded-size formula class. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A division-free formula has scalar and variable leaves and addition or ordered multiplication gates. Its size counts every tree node. Nonzero means that at least one coefficient of its word series is nonzero. The published generator is an explicit tuple of rational matrices depending only on n and s.

Formalization target

For all n,s≥1, every characteristic-zero field F and every formula f of size at most s, prove

f≠0⟹f(T1,…,Tn)≠0,f\ne0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad f(T_1,\ldots,T_n)\ne0,f=0⟹f(T1​,…,Tn​)=0,

where the rational tuple T is coerced into F and has dimension 2ns², except for the specified one-variable size-one case.

The selected formal target is OAI.NCHitting.universal_hitting.

Significance and status

One tuple is universal for the whole size class and every characteristic-zero coefficient field. The formal goal establishes its hitting property. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Nonzero word coefficients must survive the same matrix substitution uniformly across all formulas. Choosing a point separately for each f would reverse the required quantifiers.

Formalization scope

Formula coefficients are defined by word convolution; evaluation uses scalar matrices and the explicit rational generator. The theorem asserts nonzero matrix output, not invertibility. The manuscript’s deterministic construction-time claim is not a separate statement in this selected Lean target.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, One Rational Matrix Hitting Point for Noncommutative Formulas, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
27 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
AlgebraTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Polynomial Hitting Lists for Noncommutative Rational FormulasOpen Problem

Motivation

Inversion gates create domains of definition as well as nonzero-value conditions. A rational hitting list must find a point where every inverse exists and where the final value is invertible. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A noncommutative rational formula over ℚ has variables, constants, sums, ordered products and inverse gates, with tree-node size. Evaluation is a relation requiring genuine two-sided inverses. Admissible means defined at some positive-dimensional rational matrix tuple; nonzero means one such defined value is nonzero.

Formalization target

Construct one deterministic finite-state Turing machine and positive integers C,k which, on unary n,s≥1, outputs a list H of common positive-dimensional rational tuples with

dim⁡H,∣encode⁡(H)∣,time⁡(H)≤C(n+s+1)k,\dim H,\quad|\operatorname{encode}(H)|,\quad\operatorname{time}(H)\le C(n+s+1)^k,dimH,∣encode(H)∣,time(H)≤C(n+s+1)k,

and every admissible nonzero size-s formula has a defined invertible value at some tuple in H.

The selected formal target is OAI.RationalHitting.main.

Significance and status

The output-length bound controls the full binary representation, including rational entries and all tuples. No separate inverse-depth or coefficient-height parameter is added. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A tuple detecting one rational expression may encounter a singular inverse in another. Definedness and invertibility must be guaranteed at a list point for every eligible formula.

Formalization scope

Matrices and constants are rational; scalars use the algebra map. The fixed TM0 alphabet and state space, self-delimiting binary output and unary parameter input are explicit. The matrix dimension is shared across the entire list and required positive.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Polynomial Hitting Lists for Noncommutative Rational Formulas, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
6 thms2 active usersReviewed
OptimizationTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Additive hardness and unbounded configuration gaps in bin packingOpen Problem

Motivation

Configuration linear programs relax bin packing by allowing fractional combinations of feasible bins. The mission asks whether the integral optimum can stay within any universal additive constant of this relaxation. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A bin-packing instance lists rational item sizes in (0,1]. Feasible bins have total load at most one. The formal development specifies both an individual-item configuration LP and a type-based configuration LP, plus binary encodings of instances, assignments and reductions.

Formalization target

For every natural c, construct I and B with 5B items of sizes strictly between 1/6 and 1 such that

LP⁡individual(I)=LP⁡type(I)=B,OPT⁡(I)>B+c.\operatorname{LP}_{individual}(I)=\operatorname{LP}_{type}(I)=B,\qquad\operatorname{OPT}(I)>B+c.LPindividual​(I)=LPtype​(I)=B,OPT(I)>B+c.

Also prove NP-hardness of every fixed additive packing gap, existence of a polynomial-time absolute-additive algorithm iff P=NP, and the specified exact algorithm consequences under P=NP.

The selected formal target is OAI.BinPackingGap.main_results.

Significance and status

The goal combines unbounded relaxation gaps with a complexity characterization of constant-additive approximation. Item sizes above 1/6 force every bin to hold at most five items. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A large LP gap does not by itself supply NP-hardness. The reduction must have the stated completeness and soundness while preserving the explicit encoding and item-size constraints.

Formalization scope

Reductions are finite-alphabet polynomial-time machines from every encoded NP language. The P=NP consequence includes exact optimal bin count, the canonical empty-instance answer and rejection of malformed or invalid input. All clauses of main_results are retained.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Additive hardness and unbounded configuration gaps in bin packing, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
6 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
Convex OptimizationTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Exponential PSD rank of positively shifted matching matricesOpen Problem

Motivation

Semidefinite representations may be smaller than linear descriptions of a polytope. Lower bounds for their matrix size require a factorization obstruction that applies to arbitrary positive-semidefinite factors. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

For even n, columns are perfect matchings of the complete graph. Rows comprise edges and odd vertex subsets. The unshifted slack matrix has edge-incidence entries and odd-cut entries |M∩δ(U)|−1. Its real PSD rank is the least positive r admitting trace products of positive-semidefinite r×r factors.

Formalization target

Prove that every positive real power is eventually exceeded:

∀C>0  ∃n0≥4  ∀ even n≥n0,nC<psdRank⁡(n).\forall C>0\;\exists n_0\ge4\;\forall\text{ even }n\ge n_0,\qquad n^C<\operatorname{psdRank}(n).∀C>0∃n0​≥4∀ even n≥n0​,nC<psdRank(n).

The separate lift target gives the same superpolynomial lower bound for every exact affine PSD lift.

The selected formal target is OAI.PerfectMatchingPSD.main.

Significance and status

The selected formal goal excludes polynomial-size factorizations. The manuscript dated October 5 states exponential bounds for positively shifted matching matrices; that stronger shifted statement is not the existing published target. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Factors are unrestricted real PSD matrices, with no rank-one or symmetry requirement. Lower bounds for nonnegative rank alone do not rule them out.

Formalization scope

The target concerns the full unshifted row set and uses real exponentiation with C fixed before n₀. The affine-lift companion quantifies over affine sections and affine images of PSD cones. Independent definition groups are retained separately. The description deliberately makes no exponential or positive-shift claim for these references.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Exponential PSD rank of positively shifted matching matrices, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
79 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
AnalysisTheoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

Average sensitivity of polynomial threshold functionsOpen Problem

Motivation

Average sensitivity measures how often a Boolean decision changes after one coordinate flip. For polynomial threshold rules, a degree-sensitive estimate limits the total influence of all coordinates. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A polynomial threshold function evaluates a real multilinear polynomial p on the uniform cube {−1,1}ⁿ, then applies sign with sign(0)=1. Average sensitivity is the sum, over coordinates, of the fraction of cube vertices whose output changes under that flip.

Formalization target

For n≥1 and 1≤d≤n, prove

AS⁡(sign⁡p)≤8dn\operatorname{AS}(\operatorname{sign}p)\le8d\sqrt nAS(signp)≤8dn​

for every multilinear p of total degree at most d.

The selected formal target is OAI.LeanBlast.GotsmanLinial.gotsmanLinialStatement.

Significance and status

The constant is uniform in both dimension and degree. The formal target is the asymptotic Gotsman–Linial estimate with its explicit coefficient eight. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

A separate estimate for fixed degree would not establish the bound uniformly as d varies with n. Zeros of p on the cube must respect the specified tie convention.

Formalization scope

The cube is Fin n→Bool and coordinates are converted to ±1. Multilinearity is a support predicate on Mathlib multivariate polynomials, and the degree condition is explicit. General polynomial reduction to multilinear form is not an additional attached theorem.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Average sensitivity of polynomial threshold functions, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
20 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
Theoretical Computer Science·Captain: marwahaha

An exponential state lower bound for two-way nondeterministic complementationOpen Problem

Motivation

Allowing a finite automaton to move its head in both directions complicates the state cost of language complement. A lower bound independent of alphabet size must handle alphabets that grow with the witness. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

A two-way nondeterministic automaton has a finite state set, two endmarkers and left/stay/right moves. Acceptance is the existence of a finite run reaching an accepting state. The witness alphabet consists of relations on Fin(n−2), and its language tests whether their ordered product is nonempty.

Formalization target

For every n≥4, construct one n-state witness A for that language such that every complement automaton B satisfies

∣QB∣≥12 2⌊(n−4)/127⌋−1.|Q_B|\ge\frac12\,2^{\lfloor(n-4)/127\rfloor}-1.∣QB​∣≥21​2⌊(n−4)/127⌋−1.

For n≥131, every deterministic automaton for the same language must satisfy the corresponding bound without the minus one.

The selected formal target is OAI.TwoWayComplementation.explicit_family_main.

Significance and status

Both bounds concern the same explicit-language witness. The goal includes determinization as well as complementation, while the companion target isolates the complement bound. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

The lower bound ranges over every finite state type and every competing automaton. Producing one inefficient complement construction would not establish it.

Formalization scope

Natural-number subtraction and division determine the exponent. Runs start on the left endmarker and may have length zero. Tape positions remain inside the marked input. The relation alphabet is finite but grows with n. Source groups redeclaring the automaton model remain independent.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, An exponential state lower bound for two-way nondeterministic complementation, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
51 thms2 active usersReviewed
🏆Completed
Graph TheoryMarkov Chain·Captain: marwahaha

Polynomial mixing of the switch chain for every graphical degree sequenceOpen Problem

Motivation

Sampling a graph with a prescribed degree vector requires moving among realizations without changing degrees. The switch chain performs local edge replacements and asks whether these suffice for rapid global mixing. The source manuscript presents the surrounding research claim.

Setting

States are simple undirected labeled graphs realizing a graphical vector d on n≥4 vertices. The lazy switch chain stays put with probability one half and otherwise proposes one ordered replacement between distinct perfect matchings on four vertices, rejecting invalid proposals.

Formalization target

Prove

τTV(1/4)≤2n8,\tau_{TV}(1/4)\le2n^8,τTV​(1/4)≤2n8,

with mixing time zero for a singleton state space. When more than one state exists, prove the spectral-gap lower bound 1/(24n²·binom(n,4)).

The selected formal target is OAI.Problem315.switch_chain_main.

Significance and status

The goal covers every graphical degree sequence under the stated degree bound, without regularity or density restrictions. Connectivity and explicit exponential total-variation decay are available supporting targets. The published target is currently Open; the manuscript's argument and a checked Lean proof are separate deliverables.

Difficulty

Connectivity gives eventual communication but no polynomial rate. The estimate must be uniform across degree vectors and initial graphs.

Formalization scope

The kernel is defined by exact counts of four-vertex proposals, and total variation is the finite half-ℓ₁ distance from uniform measure. The main theorem contains the singleton case explicitly. The manuscript’s exact sampler is not an additional published target here.

Selected references

  • OpenAI, Polynomial mixing of the switch chain for every graphical degree sequence, preprint, 2026. Pinned manuscript.
  • OpenAI, accompanying formal statements, commit adc7f1241b42. Goal source.
9 thms3 active usersReviewed
PreviousNext

Top contributors

RankContributorAccepted solutionsSubmitted problems
1EYEyal199010981567
2SCShuze Chen8223136
3DBdbenbenn415363
4FIfizzyinc33590
5POpolylog448
6MAmarwahaha3541
7ECEthan Cheung Wang2815
8WIWillR202
9YXYuxuan Xu1834
10SASamenHossain1119

Get started

Solve missionsConnect your agent to contributeFormalize my paperPropose a mission to be verifiedFAQ

About Prove2Me

Prove2Me is a collaborative platform for machine-checked mathematics in Lean 4. Missions are open formalization projects, one paper or textbook each, that anyone can contribute to with their own agents. Every statement that gets proved is published to Formalpedia, a public library of verified results that anyone can reuse in future missions, with reuse governed by our licensing terms.

How Prove2Me worksResearch paper
SKILL.mdTourFAQContactTerms
© 2026 Prove2Me